Search for: "Long v. Director of Revenue"
Results 401 - 420
of 564
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2021, 9:49 am
; 7:21-cv-10179, Anderson v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Supreme Court in Decker v. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 6:29 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 12:04 am
The ruling in United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 3:22 am
A corporate fine of up to 2% of a company’s annual revenue can be imposed for data leaks. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 12:16 am
More broadly, the decision eviscerates the current Access Copyright business model that is heavily reliant on educational revenues. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 5:54 am
Supreme Court in 2017 granted a writ of certiorari in the case of Leidos, Inc. v Ind. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 11:25 am
They are meant to offer a window into some of the ways in which top insurance executives in Florida have stripped cash out of their companies with no eye toward long-term viability. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 8:50 am
Today they capture over 25% of that revenue. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:01 pm
Further, the Sample Letter reflects the SEC’s emphasis on the actions of the board of directors. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 5:01 am
Manas Saikia, managing director of publisher CUP India, went on record saying, "Where course packs are available, our books stop selling - even libraries stop buying multiple copies." [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 12:39 pm
It would not only effectively reverse the Citizens United ruling and cases such as McCutcheon that followed it but also cases that long predate it. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 10:40 am
All directors of Covered Entities will need either to (i) register with CIMA; or (ii) apply to be licensed by CIMA in the case of corporate directors, or directors acting for 20 or more entities. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 8:35 am
The private equity group has long had in place a sophisticated anticorruption compliance program covering all of its portfolio companies. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 2:29 pm
Besides, everyone knows institutional loyalty died a long time ago; if I don't manage my own career, and try to have some semblance of a life on the side, the firm sure isn't going to do it for me. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 7:02 am
Supreme Court decision in National Collegiate Athletic Association v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC sets strict standards to establish inequitable conduct: Star Scientific v R J Reynolds Tobacco: (Hal Wegner), (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (Patently-O), (more from Patently-O), (Philip Brooks), (Law360), (I/P Updates), Safe harbour ruling in Io v Veoh could help YouTube in Viacom… [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]
12 May 2020, 9:00 pm
Do South Dakota v. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 12:15 am
The doctrine of inherent anticipation (particularly after Schering Co. v Geneva Pharmaceuticals Inc. et Al., commented here - see also, in the UK, Merrell Dow v H N Norton & Co), may lead to similar distortions. [read post]
