Search for: "MERRELL"
Results 401 - 420
of 602
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2011, 1:08 pm
Merrell Dow Pharms., Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 589-90 (1993), do not apply at the class certification stage of the case. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 8:51 am
It's not the first time per Miller-Merrell. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 11:19 am
He didn't file suit, however, until June 2009.Dead to rights under the Texas two-year statute of limitations, plaintiff tried to argue that his claim didn't "accrue" until there was scientific evidence sufficient to satisfy Texas' version of Daubert, which was imposed in Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 6:16 pm
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals in 1993, the federal law governing expert testimony has undergone a radical transformation. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 8:52 am
MERRELL DOW PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., laying down the foundation of admissibility of scientific expert testimony. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 11:38 am
The judge allowed me an ex-parte hearing, so I made my argument… in blue jeans, an open shirt, a blazer, and Merrells. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 1:24 pm
[Readers: Set forth below is a thoughtful and detailed analysis of the Supreme Court's decision of Walmart v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 5:00 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), applies to class certifications. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 4:52 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 3:41 pm
Merrell Dow Pharms., Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993). [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 3:24 pm
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 (1993). [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 8:51 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 569 N.E.2d 875, 879 (Ohio 1991) (the prescriber’s treatment of plaintiff under a manufacturer’s research protocol and receipt of a per patient payment from the manufacturer did not affect physician’s independence).Blatt v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Richardson-Merrell, Inc., 643 F. [read post]
18 May 2011, 4:08 pm
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 [1993]) to determine whether expert scientific testimony is admissible. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm
Justice KG BalakrishnanThe Supreme Court in Selvi & Ors. v State of Karnataka has examined the law relating to the involuntary administration of certain scientific techniques, namely narcoanalysis, polygraph examination and the Brain Electrical Activation Profile (BEAP) test for the purpose of improving investigation efforts in criminal cases. [read post]
13 May 2011, 1:44 pm
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993). [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
By now Restatement (Second) of Torts §402A (1965) is so old as to be thought of as somewhat antediluvian. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:30 am
Jessica Miller-Merrell’s blog offers advice for employers navigating these waters. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:28 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals fans) for singling out these ten ACMIE cases. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 3:50 pm
Richardson-Merrell, Inc., 857 F.2d 823, 829 (D.C. [read post]
