Search for: "Marion v. State"
Results 401 - 420
of 755
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2022, 1:06 pm
Blessing v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 9:19 am
The following criminal cases of note were decided this week: Washington State Law Washington State Supreme Court: State v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 10:05 am
DAVID MARION WHITE The settlement agreement expressly allowed White to remain in the home until October 25, 2004. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 10:29 pm
Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc., 314 F.3d 1313, 1355-56 (Fed. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 9:35 am
Then it will discuss the history of voter access in the United States, with a focus on Harper v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 6:20 pm
GUNDY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 3:52 am
Hardwick and Texas v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 1:13 pm
Marion Co. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 8:00 pm
Marion City Election Board and Indiana Democratic Party v. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 6:30 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Stefan Scott v. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 6:28 pm
Tomorrow the high court will be hearing Crawford v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 11:57 am
In Crawford v. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 8:14 am
Marion County Election Board, in which six justices approved of Indiana’s voter-identification law. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 9:14 am
Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc., 457 F.3d 1293, 1313 (Fed. [read post]
22 May 2008, 2:51 pm
Guimond rejected the challenge, and on May 21, a three-judge panel of the state's Court of Appeals affirmed that ruling in Martinez v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 5:24 am
The South Carolina voter ID case provides a much stronger argument given Marion v Crawford County rejecting the bulk of Holder’s arguments. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
Supreme Court in Worcester v. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 8:30 am
Marion County Election Board, 07-21, and Indiana Democratic Party v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 8:05 am
Marion County Election Board, the evidentiary record establishes that the law substantially burdens the voting rights of hundreds of thousands of the state’s voters, and that the law does not advance a legitimate state interest; and (2) whether a state’s voter ID law violates Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act where the law disproportionately burdens and abridges the voting rights of African-American and Latino voters compared to White voters. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 6:00 am
Marion County, Hasen argues that bad losses in election law cases are sometimes best avoided by staying out of the Supreme Court. [read post]
