Search for: "Mark Connot"
Results 401 - 420
of 1,144
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2018, 2:39 am
The Board concluded that the marks are similar in appearance, pronunciation, connotation, and overall commercial impression due to the common term GUARDIAN.The Goods: The Board observed that it is not necessary for all the goods in the application and cited registration to be related in order to support a likelihood of confusion finding. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 2:46 am
"Conclusion: In sum, the Board found that the marks are similar in structure and identical in connotation, and will be used on identical goods presumably sold in the same channels of trade to the same classes of consumers. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 1:07 pm
This factor, as well as the unique connotation and strong commercial impression of Applicant’s mark helped to distinguish it from Opposer’s mark. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 3:13 am
Of course, applicant's mark (with no color claim) could be used in colors similar to those of the registered mark.Applicant's suggestion that HEROES would be the first word read in its mark was belied by its own application and its appeal brief, which refer to the mark as consisting of "the stylized text "PINT SIZE HEROES.'" The smaller sized text used for PINT SIZE serves to "reinforce the connotation and commercial impression… [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 5:18 am
However, the drawing of a large estate home or chateau would correspond to or call to mind the word CHATEAU in Registrant’s mark and convey similar connotations and commercial impressions. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 3:22 am
The word marks at issue both connote a "dead bird," and the term has no significance in connection with beer or wine. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 2:44 am
The Marks: Applicant's mark GAVIOTA means "seagull" in English. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 12:23 pm
Although more recent precedent played a greater role in this term’s decisions so far, several older decisions have clearly also left their marks. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 8:19 am
The Trademark Trial and AppealBoard upheld the examining attorney’s rejection based onits findings that the two marks are similar in terms oftheir appearance, sound, connotation, and commercialimpression, and that consumers would likely identifygoods covered under the marks to emanate from a singlesource. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 3:15 am
However, the marks at issue differ in connotation and commercial impression: Opposer’s mark simply conjures a feeling of nostalgia for “pirates” or “piracy,” and this is certainly enhanced in the context of the goods, inasmuch as there is a strong association between rum and pirates. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 2:46 am
Cir. 1992).The Board found the marks to be "highly similar" in appearance, sound, connotation, and commercial impression. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 2:39 am
The USPTO refused registration of the mark SAVORY ROASTERS for "pet food; pet treats" [SAVORY disclaimed], deeming the mark likely to cause confusion with the registered mark HEARTY ROASTERS for "pet food. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 2:58 am
Pologeorgis).The Marks: The Board observed that the word TROPICS is the phonetic equivalent of TROPIXX, and it concluded that the marks have the same connotation and commercial impression. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 3:02 am
Turning to the marks, the Board found their connotations and commercial impressions to be essentially the same. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 2:17 pm
Nonetheless, courts have held that " 'national defense' had acquired a well-known meaning 'as a generic concept of broad connotations, referring to the military and naval establishments and the related activities of national preparedness.'" ... [read post]
31 May 2018, 1:35 pm
” That being said, the Board concluded that in considering the parties’ marks in the entirety as to appearance, sound, connotation, and commercial impression, the “many differences between the marks outweigh their similarity. [read post]
30 May 2018, 2:55 am
" In sum, the marks are similar in sight, sound, connotation and commercial impression.The Goods and Services: "[T]he mere fact that a restaurant may offer certain food items or beverages does not by itself mean that the food or drink is related to the restaurant services; rather, in order '[t]o establish likelihood of confusion a party must show something more than that similar or even identical marks are used for food products and for restaurant… [read post]
15 May 2018, 2:41 am
The Board reversed a Section 2(e)(3) refusal to register the mark LAROMANA for "brown sugar," finding the mark not to be primarily geographically deceptively misdescriptive. [read post]
11 May 2018, 1:24 am
As such, the marks are similar as to sound, the words have the same pronunciation and connotation of a name and the Board weighed in favour of a finding of a likelihood of confusion. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:17 am
As with the use of any ‘brand’, it would be advisable to check the relevant trade mark register before using any sign with Royal connotations. [read post]
