Search for: "Materials Co., Ltd." Results 401 - 420 of 1,824
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2020, 6:42 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Also, they are subject to the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA).[617] Under PIPEDA, an ISP is not permitted to disclose a subscriber’s personal information without the subscriber’s knowledge or consent, except in certain specified circumstances, including where required by court order.[618] Therefore, a complainant faced with an allegedly defamatory anonymous comment must generally bring a motion for an order requiring the website host and ISP to… [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 10:13 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
Van Dam was allegedly designated as “an accredited FFT trainer” in a co-authored publication with Sexton, which F.F.T. interprets as suggesting that Van Dam was using the FFT℠ training materials that were only licensed for Sexton’s use. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 4:40 am by Tom Kosakowski
(OIST Posting; OIST Policy 42.)Note: A couple years ago, Bruce McLin, the former HR manager with OIST worked with Noriko Tada (Ombuds with Guidea for Eisai Co., Ltd.), Nick Diehl (then Ombuds for the Asian Development Bank) and Charmhee Kim (Ombuds with McKinsey & Co.) on presentations in Japan and an article for the Japan Institute for Labour Policy and Training Report.Related posts: Ombuds to Speak at Hitotsubashi University; Japan Institute for Labour… [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 4:28 am
The same also occurred in relation to 'Shape of You', as it was alleged, that it was copied, in part, from a song called 'No Scrubs', since the writers also now appear as co-authors and receive a 15% share of the PRS royalties. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 2:41 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Unwired Planet International Ltd & Anor v Huawei Technologies (UK) Co Ltd & Anor, Huawei Technologies Co Ltd & Anor v Conversant Wireless Licensing SARL and ZTE Corporation & Anor v Conversant Wireless Licensing SARL, heard 21- 24 October. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 12:37 pm
Ltd & Rhodia Operations S.A.S. v Neo Chemicals and Oxides Limited & Neo Performance Materials Inc. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 5:16 am
However, it has been identified as a defence in the CJEU case of Budĕjovický Budvar, národní podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (C-482/09).Hacon HHJ drew on the summary of honest concurrent use from Victoria Plum Ltd v Victorian Plumbing [2016] EWHC 2911 (Ch) (see IPKat analysis here), which established that it would be possible for two separate entities to co-exist, such that the inevitable confusion that arises has to be tolerated.… [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 7:34 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Godfrey, where the Court applied the discoverability principle to extend the two year limitation period in the Competition Act, [31] This Court has recognized that limitation periods may be subject to a rule of discoverability, such that a cause of action will not accrue for the purposes of the running of a limitation period until “the material facts on which [the cause of action] is based have been discovered or ought to have been discovered by the plaintiff by the exercise of… [read post]
3 Nov 2019, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
Newspapers, Journalism and Regulation The Queen (on the application of the British Broadcasting Corporation) v Newcastle Crown Court [2019] EWHC 2756 (Admin), covers the matter of producing journalistic material following court orders. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 2:01 pm by Kevin LaCroix
A detailed October 25, 2019 memo from the Clyde & Co law firm about the judgment can be found here. [read post]