Search for: "Matter of Crawford" Results 401 - 420 of 1,015
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2013, 11:46 am by Schachtman
., 406 F.2d 1315, 1318 (3d Cir. 1969) (holding that defendant cannot be found liable on the basis that it supplied 75-80% of the kind of tire purchased by the plaintiff; any verdict based on this evidence “would at best be a guess”) Crawford v. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 9:45 am
James Crawford (Univ. of Cambridge - Law) has posted The Term of Office of the UN Secretary-General. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 9:07 am
This issue has been an ongoing concern for the past two years, causing matters that may not proceed in court to be bumped from the chambers list. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 7:48 am by Christopher G. Hill
  No matter how well prepared, trained and rule compliant management and the company in general are with all of these regulations, human beings are on these job sites and human beings (even the most conscientious ones) make mistakes. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 11:54 am by Cynthia Pladziewicz
For example Jones Day partnerSally Crawford takes joy and pride in being known as the "queen of pro bono. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 3:35 am by Russ Bensing
  In over a quarter century on the Court now, the only legacy he’s got, decision-wise, is Crawford and Blakely; cases which, ironically, are favorable to defendants. [read post]
3 Nov 2012, 11:57 am
 As of today Midwest Generations and its parent, Edison International, are looking for ways to reorganize their debt and nothing is off the table; including the closure of inefficient plants no matter where they are, reducing operational costs, cutting the workforce by the end of 2012, and just plain maintenance of an efficient system. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 5:06 am by Jamison Koehler
Fortunately (and no matter what else you may think of Justice Scalia, you have to thank him for this), there is Crawford v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 3:44 am by Russ Bensing
She argued that this was a 10th Amendment violation, the Federal government intruding upon matters properly left to the states, but the 3rd District held, for reasons known only to them and their god, that she didn’t have standing to raise the issue. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 5:41 am by Russ Bensing
Crawford, a 13-judge panel heard an appeal from case where a candidate was sanctioned for this offense, and decided that this ran afoul of   In that case, a former appellate judge had only identified himself in that fashion in one place on his brochure, which in seven other places he referred to himself as “Judge O’Neill. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 7:39 am by Stephen Wermiel
The Confrontation Clause is not a matter of convenience, he continued; instead, it requires cross-examination to make sure statements are reliable. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 2:17 am by Michael DelSignore
Given Justice Thomas' vote in the Crawford decision, I do not believe he could find the statement non testimonial in this matter and expect that the United States Supreme Court would reverse the conviction. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 8:32 am by David Edelstein
This is one area where the Supreme Court’s rewrite of Confrontation Clause jurisprudence in Crawford v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 1:39 pm by Lyle Denniston
   The court rejected that argument, saying that, while the Supreme Court ruling (in Crawford v. [read post]