Search for: "Matter of G."
Results 401 - 420
of 11,460
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2014, 6:05 am
G model). [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 2:36 pm
Rowe (University of Florida - Fredric G. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 8:42 am
This Blog/Blawg, NJ Family Issues, is managed by Paul G. [read post]
6 May 2011, 7:00 am
The show took a fatal turn away from that path two years ago when Kris Allen outlasted Adam Lambert, and the ascension this year of the G-Rated Lambert and two uninspiring country artists has not improved matters. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 3:00 am
[1] As a matter of candor, I wish to point out that Solvay is represented by my firm, Oblon Spivak. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 10:17 am
On April 26, 2021 the Government Accountability Office (GAO) issued a decision in the matter of Innovate Now, LLC. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 7:51 pm
We conclude as a matter of lawthat it was not. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
Yves Dezalay and Bryant G. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 12:18 pm
The Court is evidently still considering the matter. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 1:35 am
Lord Dyson emphasised that the “focus should be on the substance of the matter”, and that “The Court should always keep in mind the importance of ensuring that the guarantees afforded by Article 6 (1) are not illusory” (para. 69). [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 12:00 am
According to decision G 1/15, "entitlement to partial priority may not be refused for a claim encompassing alternative subject-matter by virtue of one or more generic expressions or otherwise (generic "OR"-claim) provided that said alternative subject-matter has been disclosed for the first time, directly, or at least implicitly, unambiguously and in an enabling manner in the priority document. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 2:14 am
Legal Background: Purity as conventionIn assessing the novelty of a claimed invention, the burden of proof is normally placed on the patent office (or opposing third party) to find evidence of at least an implicit disclosure of the claimed subject matter in the prior art (G 2/88, G 2/10). [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 8:14 am
G 1/03 and G 2/10 relate to different cases, so cannot prima facie be considered as somehow conflicting, but Board 3.3.09 made the currently pending referral G 1/16 while handling appeal T 0437/14 asking a.o. whether the G 2/10 decision effects how some aspects of G 1/03 shall be interpreted. [read post]
7 May 2024, 10:22 am
He will succeed current Executive Director Mindy G. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 3:38 pm
In the Matter of an Application of the United States of America for an Order Authorizing the Release of Historical Cell-Site Information, the Eastern District Judge Nicholas G. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm
”[11] In its decisions G 1/03 and G 2/03 the EBA has explained that an applicant may not arbitrarily amend its claims and that a disclaimer that may be required ought not to exclude more that is necessary to exclude the subject-matter that is excluded from patentability for non-technical reasons. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 12:30 am
However, converting from ST.25 to ST.26 has the potential to add matter (as acknowledged by the WIPO itself). [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 5:34 am
BROUSSARD, THOMAS G. [read post]
29 May 2017, 11:15 pm
The principles affirmed in G 1/15 did not apply to the present case. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 4:45 pm
According to this approach disclaimers which exclude subject-matter disclosed as an embodiment of the invention are regarded as non-disclosed disclaimers and held unallowable unless they fall under one of the exceptions laid down in decisions G 1/03 and G 2/03. [42] In T 1050/99 considerable weight is placed on a passage in G 1/03 [2.5] concerning disclaimers which exclude non-working embodiments. [read post]
