Search for: "May v. Department of Corrections et al"
Results 401 - 420
of 439
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2016, 6:07 pm
Next Door Company, et al. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included:Record labels sue Baidu over providing links to file-sharing sites: (Ars Technica), (Techdirt), (Out-Law), (IP Law360), (Copyfight), Merck’s Fosamax patent expires: Watson Pharmaceuticals to distribute authorized generic version, Teva and Barr also launch FDA approved generic versions: (SmartBrief), (Patent Circle), (In … [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 7:51 am
V Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 9:01 am
At the same time, the FCC has issued guidance for USAC not to deny funding applications solely based on failure to select the correct drop-down option where the applicant has otherwise complied with competitive bidding rules. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 10:02 pm
However, as suggested in this case’s note, there are serious doubts about the correctness of the Supreme Court’s interpretation and application the Civil Marriage Law and its Procedural Regulation. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
Upon the "third strike", sanctions may be taken. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 8:29 pm
The Supreme Court recognized this connection in General Electric v. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 5:04 am
On June 1st, 2017, the United States District Court (USDC) at Washington D.C. granted summary judgement in the case of Adam Steele, et al. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 4:00 am
” The new HR manager lacked experience heading an HR department, but the owner of the company decided to take a chance because she was a “smart, young lady” and he was willing to send her to training. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 4:00 am
” The new HR manager lacked experience heading an HR department, but the owner of the company decided to take a chance because she was a “smart, young lady” and he was willing to send her to training. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 11:03 am
., LLC v. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 3:00 am
Instead, it creates a new, untested system in which it is very easy to get content taken down, and very hard to identify or correct wrongful removals. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 11:14 am
City of Fremont (Doug Rich, et al., Real Parties in Interest) (2018) ____ Cal.App.5th ____. [read post]
2 Jan 2007, 3:28 am
So Johnson, McNamara, Bush, Nixon, Kissinger, Bush II, Cheney, Rumsfeld, et al - - unlike the soon to be hung (or, by the time this appears, perhaps the recently hung) Saddam - - will never see the inside of a dock or a prison let alone stand on a gallows. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 11:35 am
Department of Justice. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 10:26 am
City of San Diego (Jan Dunning, et al, Real Parties In Interest) (2017) ___ Cal.App.5th _____. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 6:03 am
Path. et al. v. [read post]
Thoughts on the SG’s “Lesbian Comparator” Argument in the Pending Title VII Sexual-Orientation Cases
6 Sep 2019, 5:08 am
Clayton County, Georgia, No. 17-1618, and Altitude Express, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 2:40 pm
As the Supreme Court recognized in the Reno v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 3:18 pm
In July 2009, real parties Peter Plotkin et al., filed a suit against the City for inverse condemnation and damages due to condemnation blight. [read post]
