Search for: "Miles v. United States" Results 401 - 420 of 1,716
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2025, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
United States, ruling 8-1 that the IRS was well within its discretion to prohibit tax exempt status for private educational institutions which discriminate on the basis of race. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 8:00 am
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) filed suit the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, (EEOC v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 7:35 am
United States [quoting the McDonnell case].In the McDonnell case, Roberts found that prosecutors had defined “official acts” too broadly; in the Trump decision, he took the position that prosecutors had considered the question too narrowly. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 9:00 pm by Jareb Gleckel
With a conservative majority on the Supreme Court, the question everybody has been asking is what the future of abortion will look like in the United States. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 1:44 pm by Kenneth J. Vanko
--Court: United States District Court for the Middle District of FloridaOpinion Date: 5/13/10Cite: Concrete Surface Innovations, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 10:37 am by Katherine McCoy
Environmental Protection Agency, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit vacated EPA’s policy limiting the reach of the Sixth Circuit’s decision in Summit Petroleum Corp. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 8:01 am by Tom Smith
The massive destruction of Syrian government forces through three hours of sustained bombardment by the United States Air Force  – B52s, F-15s, MQ-9s, Ac-130s, AN-64 Apache helicopters – on the night of 7-8 February resulted in the deaths of at least a hundred Russian mercenaries, if not more (figures of 300 or more are being bandied about.) [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 8:55 am by Amy Howe
The highest-profile grant of the day came in United States v. [read post]
The Corps eventually issued an approved jurisdictional determination (JD),[ii] stating that the landowners’ wetland was a “water of the United States” because of its “significant nexus” to the Red River, which was 120 miles away. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 2:27 pm by Rick E. Rayl
United States, in which the Court was persuaded that a taking could exist for temporary flooding situations, arguably expanding the scope of another leading regulatory takings decision, Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]