Search for: "Mills v. United States" Results 401 - 420 of 993
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2016, 8:36 am by Dan Tench and Lucy Hayes, Olswang LLP
This is relevant to the judgment in Patel v Mirza (which had not been released at the date of our interview) relating to illegality: “The whole issue of how the Courts approach illegality as a defence to claims in contract and tort has been, to a degree, shaped by the Law Commission’s work on that area of law. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 1:07 pm by Neha Mehta
On June 27, 2016, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued an opinion providing more insight into the patentability of software programs. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 6:41 am by Dennis Crouch
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, et al., No. 15-1314 Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation v. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 3:19 am
The horror comes not merely from the subject of the listing but from its banality, the reduction of its components to ritualized actions whose principle interest in in its aggregation ("In Italia seicento e quaranta; In Alemagna duecento e trentuna; Cento in Francia, in Turchia novantuna; Ma in Ispagna son già mille e tre"), without regard to rank, value or societal impact ("E v'han donne d'ogni grado, D'ogni forma, d'ogni… [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 9:47 pm by Ad Law Defense
** FDA concludes its study on “Evaporated Cane Juice” – issues guidance that it is a misleading description for mere Sugar… [read post]
11 May 2016, 10:38 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The book ends by considering Beyonce’s appropriation of a white Belgian choreographer’s work, which Kraut considers to be reversing the “racialized logic of property that helped underwrite the development of choreographic copyright in the United States. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 8:56 am by Rory Little
United States was not, after oral argument, much of a surprise. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 12:46 pm by Douglas Cantwell
Egan seemed to suggest a state has no duty to reassess whether the host state is still “unwilling or unable” as long as the non-state group continues to engage in hostilities that threaten the intervening state. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 7:28 am by Rory Little
United States will be declared to apply retroactively for all purposes, including on first and even successive (assuming they are timely filed) habeas corpus petitions. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 9:48 pm by Stephen Page
While the US has full faith and credit meaning allowing the portability of orders made in one particular part of the United States to take effect throughout the United States, each state has its own particular rules to do with family law and often there are different rules that apply from county to county. [read post]