Search for: "Nichols v. State" Results 401 - 420 of 613
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2011, 11:36 pm by Will Aitchison
LEXIS at *21, plaintiffs here have provided a sufficient approximation of their overtime hours worked, see Nichols v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 9:58 am by Allison C. Smith
Nichols stated in her testimony that CARB will hold a public workshop in the next few weeks on its proposal to delay cap-and-trade compliance and other elements needed to finalize the cap-and-trade regulation. [read post]
5 Jun 2011, 3:46 pm by Dan Bushell
Importing the 5th DCA’s reasoning in State Farm Florida Insurance Co. v. [read post]
22 May 2011, 9:11 pm
Nichols, 512 F.3d 789, 794 (6th Cir. 2008), overruled on other grounds by United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 5:22 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Nichols preferred the 2003 recipe of Ti818, the district court found that Dr. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 1:03 pm
Nichols preferred the 2003 recipe of Ti818, the district court found that Dr. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
 At least the state of the art at the time of the plaintiff’s use applies – unknown and later discovered risks are irrelevant. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 6:00 am by The Dear Rich Staff
 Salinger sued over Hamilton's paraphrasing of his letters and an appeals court ruled against Hamilton, relying on a Learned Hand case, Nichols v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 6:47 am by The Dear Rich Staff
 In National Comics, Hand was able to combine that precept with a copyright principle he had pioneered two decades earlier in Nichols v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 3:42 am by Rosalind English
There follows a succinct account of Strasbourg jurisprudence  on this point, from registration of a doctor Konig v Germany (No1)  (1979-80) 2 EHRR 170   (civil right) to liability to tax (not a civil right) (Ferrazini v Italy  (44759/98) (2001) STC 1314), via the all important decision in  Pellegrin v France (2001) 31 EHRR 26 ECHR not to allow administrative servants the guarantees of Article 6 because their employment involves important… [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:34 pm by INFORRM
This reflects the current law as stated in Chase v News Group Newspapers ([2002] EWCA Civ 1772). [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm by NL
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a request for an oral… [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm by NL
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a request for an oral… [read post]