Search for: "Null v. State"
Results 401 - 420
of 619
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2012, 8:24 pm
Nearly all states have a “fictitious names” statute. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 7:04 am
Ass’n v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 7:04 am
Ass’n v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 6:02 pm
Ass’n v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 3:37 pm
See Bassett v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 2:56 am
The South African Reserve Bank had previously required treasury approval from any South African entity wishing to transfer intellectual property offshore.Without approval the transfer of rights was null and void.In Oilwell (Pty) Ltd v Protech International Limited (noted by Afro-IP here) the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) confirmed that foreign exchange approval was no longer required for an assignment of trade marks. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 7:11 am
Klumb v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
Control Screening LLC v. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
On Friday District of Columbia District Court Judge James Boasberg issued an opinion reaffirming his ruling striking down the National Labor Relations Board's "quickie election" rules in Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 8:59 pm
Constitutional Law: Kelo v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 8:58 am
Pulli v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 12:00 am
Arizona, et al., Petitioners v United States The Court decided by five votes to three that three of four provisions inArizona’s Senate Bill 1070 were null. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 7:08 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 7:36 am
FIX v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 2:25 pm
(Eugene Volokh) Douglas v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 7:00 pm
Lartigue v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 9:14 am
(b) That the above rights were prior art; therefore, the subsequent patent and design rights granted by the Registrar to the 3rdand 4th defendant on 14 October 2010 were contrary to the provisions of the Patent and Designs Act (PDA) (NB: may not be up-to-date, as stated below) and therefore not valid [Basic principles of the patent system](c) That the Registrar erroneously granted patent and design rights to the 2nd defendant; therefore, those… [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 2:54 pm
Second, may the federal government treat as null for federal law a state-created legal status affecting family relations? [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 10:58 am
See Cook v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 5:21 am
This decision, Damache v DPP [2012] IESC 11 (discussed here), found that s.29(1) of the Offences Against the State Act 1939, which had been in operation for the past 36 years having been inserted by s.5 of the Criminal Law Act 1976, was contrary to the Constitution. [read post]
