Search for: "OXLEY v. STATE"
Results 401 - 420
of 650
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2016, 12:47 pm
PHH v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 7:13 am
In Bilski v. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 6:50 am
The Second Circuit ruled, in Nielsen v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 4:15 am
" In this order, the US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia found that - in AFLAC v. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 12:58 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 7:32 am
Evans v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 11:32 am
Evans v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 12:58 pm
; See also, Tripodi v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 4:17 pm
The justices declined to take up the case of Peruta v. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 9:22 am
The #2 slot belongs to a case whose name comprises a mouthful: Stop the Beach Renourishment Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 6:50 pm
NOVEMBER SITTING: Bilski v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 9:22 am
(Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 4:56 am
Chamber of Commerce argue that the Sarbanes-Oxley whistleblower statute requires the plaintiff to prove the employer’s retaliatory intent. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 7:03 am
And just last week, the Court agreed to hear Lewis v. [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 1:53 am
However, this approach began to change after such landmark rulings as Zubulake v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 10:56 am
But what is also true is that the employer had already sued the employee in state court for disclosing confidential information and obtained a judgement of $50,000 against him. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 5:43 pm
Equity Partners, L.P. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 2:35 pm
" For past recycling of Lemley by Mullin, seehttp://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2009/04/joe-mullin-on-copying.htmlElsewhere, PatentHawk (Gary Odom) reminds us of Stevens' first case:The first case Justice Stevens authored was Parker v. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 12:37 pm
Miller v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 10:34 am
One of those additional categories of disqualification comes from the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. [read post]
