Search for: "Oral Folks" Results 401 - 420 of 821
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2021, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
These lavish testaments to the late Justice are deeply insulting to women, people of color, LGBTQ folks, and non-Christians, as well as dangerous perpetuations of the fiction that Scalia was a Justice worth honoring. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 7:23 pm
Given the commemorations of “sacrifice” that we’ve been seeing and hearing during this centennial year [and at this conference], and within the context of the foundational ACIS tenet of interdisciplinary scholarship, Kennedy’s work provides a site for reconsidering how the oral tradition, as represented in fiction, and oral histories of specific events, such as the Easter 1916 Rising, may provide perspectives for reconsidering the historical record. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 7:14 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
A lot of folks on both sides of the ideological spectrum focused on the first takeaway from the Barrett/Kavanaugh concurrence, and missed or downplayed the second. [read post]
17 May 2011, 3:30 am by SHG
  Anybody can knock on a door and ask (nicely) to speak with the good folks inside. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 5:00 am by Steve Baird
Larry Pitts & Associates, P.C. is arguing that Lundy Law’s claimed Remember This Name mark is generic, and part of the public domain for anyone to use, oral argument is likely in January 2018. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 4:00 am
Has this term, he asks, suddenly grown a meaning which is generally understood and which is now in common use among branding folk? [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 5:01 pm by Gordon Firemark
Does Stephen need to have to have these folks’ permission to include them in the book? [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 3:55 pm by Mike McBride
They may not consciously be aware of this advantage yet, but the reality is that more and more as the population grows comfortable with processing information in these new ways, they will expect to be given more than just oral testimony from witnesses. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
"People don't mind it when folks criticize a President, Senator, or Governor for lying but for some reason we are not allowed to use that word in connection with the Supreme Court. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 8:16 pm
This means the folks at The Spoof! [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 10:27 am by Mark Ashton
 Yes, it is possible to make these agreements orally but judges are going to look at you as if you are crazy when you come to court claiming that you and your girlfriend orally agreed to form a business together. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 10:23 am by South Florida Lawyers
Well folks, it's hump day and you know what that means.....Hermitage v. [read post]
12 Apr 2008, 7:44 am
Lithwick's oral arguments reports are another. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 6:52 am
But these are the same warnings that apply to any oral contraceptive. [read post]
13 May 2012, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
The Origins of the Oral Deposition in the Federal Rules: Who's in Charge? [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 6:52 am
But these are the same warnings that apply to any oral contraceptive. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 5:37 am by Jeff Gamso
 Monday, the Court of Review heard oral argument from Chuck Babcock representing Keller and from Mike McKetta representing the Special Commission on Judicial Conduct - you know, the folks who warned us about Keller and Keller about . . . us? [read post]