Search for: "P. v. Heard" Results 401 - 420 of 2,360
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2020, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
IPSO IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 00665-20 Enticknap v The Gazette (North East, Middlesbrough & Teeside), 1 Accuracy (2019), Breach- sanction: action as offered by publication. 00624-20 Oldfield v North Wales Pioneer, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach- after investigation 00464-20 Goodwin v County Times, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach- after investigation Last Week in the Courts As already mentioned, on 3 June 2020… [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 8:51 am by Alex Guerra
On Tuesday, May 12, 2020, the Ninth Circuit heard oral argument in Freyd v. [read post]
20 May 2020, 4:21 pm by INFORRM
Most readers will immediately identify Haringey as the local authority involved in the Baby P case, some will recall that the Victoria Climbie tragedy happened on their patch too. [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:14 pm by Patricia Hughes
The court offers Skype settlement conferences when the parties agree and virtual proceedings for civil motions or applications when certain criteria are met, including the “[p]arties are represented by counsel; [t]he matter will take four hours or less; [t]here is no viva voce evidence, including cross-examination; and [a]ll parties consent, or a judge otherwise orders”. [read post]
10 May 2020, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts The trial of the data protection case of Greystoke v Financial Conduct Authority which was due to take place On 6 May 2020 the  Court of Appeal (Flaux, Popplewell and Dingemans LJJ) heard the appeal  in the case of Wright v Ver. [read post]
3 May 2020, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Nicklin J handed down judgment in the case of Hanson v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2020] EWHC 1048 (QB). [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 11:23 pm by Matthias Weller
A similar approach (with different outcome) has been taken in Ribeiro v Wright, 2020 ONSC 1829, Court of Ontario, Canada. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 4:43 am by Diane Tweedlie
To the dismay of the board, and as correctly pointed out by the appellant, the decision's reasoning with respect to the non-admittance of this fresh ground (page 6, second paragraph of the decision) is rather short, to say the least.However, as can be seen from the minutes of the oral proceedings before the opposition division, the appellant as well as the respondent were heard concerning this issue (see the minutes of the oral proceedings before the opposition division, item 1.4). [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 4:00 am by Amy Salyzyn
The presumption of open courts The Supreme Court of Canada has repeatedly stated that “[p]ublicity is the very soul of justice”[1] and that open courts are “a hallmark of a democratic society. [read post]