Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US"
Results 401 - 420
of 4,542
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2021, 12:07 pm
Case citation: Russo v. [read post]
27 Jul 2013, 6:51 am
In Teva v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 5:01 pm
The ruling in U.S. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 10:10 am
The Northern District of Illinois in Astellas US Holding, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:41 am
There are also gaps in documentation concerning the precise sources and amounts of funds used for the down payment on a residence that the ex-husband jointly purchased with another individual in April 2009 and that is presently listed for sale. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 12:05 pm
Sonos, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 1:22 pm
The case does not tell us the accused concentration, but Mylan admitted that it was within the standard rounding error, i.e., between 0.0005% and 0.0014. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 8:12 am
Because an examiner’s (or reexaminer’s) use of the broadest reasonable construction standard increases the possibility that the examiner will find the claim too broad (and deny it), use of that standard encourages the applicant to draft narrowly. [read post]
2 May 2016, 8:54 pm
YouTube v. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 12:16 pm
The ACPA was enacted precisely because there was no common law cause of action for cybersquatting. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 12:12 am
Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 11:41 am
See State v. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 6:38 am
This is precisely the type of governmental [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 9:14 am
The factual gaps on this issue include: “facts regarding the precise nature of Redbubble’s contractual relationships with third-party manufacturers and shippers”; “the precise degree to which Redbubble is involved in” selecting and imprinting trademark-infringing designs upon its products; “details as to Redbubble’s involvement in the process for returning goods”; “detail[s] on how Redbubble characterizes its own… [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 9:30 am
Last week, the court of appeals decided State v. [read post]
3 Dec 2017, 9:02 pm
ACLU Foundation v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 10:02 am
The DPC commenced these proceedings in 2016 precisely because it was concerned that, properly understood, the CJEU’s Safe Harbour judgment of 2015 was to be read as indicating that, for reasons associated with the structure of the legal system in operation in the United States, EU-US data transfers were inherently problematic. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 5:31 am
No. 3 v. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 7:16 am
From this ruling, we got 66 pages of dense judicial-ese that, in the end, tells us precisely nothing helpful. [read post]
22 May 2023, 7:46 am
Third, if the court used 7,400 clickthroughs as the numerator (which is still not precise, because a single prospective client might have clicked multiple time), the rate of actual confusion increases to 3.2%. [read post]
