Search for: "Paine v. State"
Results 401 - 420
of 6,778
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2012, 9:21 pm
Supreme Court, in Milavetz v. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 8:16 am
The previous leading authority on “white list” designation was R (Javed) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] EWCA Civ 789. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 10:55 am
Whether Judge Ronnie Abrams will follow suit, of course, remains to be seen, but Pacira has Second Circuit precedent—United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2008, 1:59 am
Rev. 1, 4 (2007) (quoting United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 1:59 pm
Possible damages in such a lawsuit include medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and loss of consortium. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 1:59 pm
Possible damages in such a lawsuit include medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and loss of consortium. [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 6:24 am
In United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 7:55 am
Facts: This case (McCoy v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 5:11 am
A: I pretty much took the advice that I found online from other donors, what they had done, what they had said, stating that the income was from pain and suffering, and sent the page of the contract that stated that. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 8:10 pm
State v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 8:28 am
In the recent case (Zhang v. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 2:18 am
This week, in Stewart v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:30 am
Chronic Pain Is Norm Even worse, chronic pain is now the norm of the work injury. [read post]
3 Nov 2019, 4:00 am
See Wainwright v. [read post]
4 Jan 2008, 9:19 am
When the Supreme Court hears arguments on Monday in Baze v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 3:06 pm
(In United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2018, 5:00 am
Pain from a black widow’s bite begins within minutes and can spread quickly to other parts of the body. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 10:32 am
Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of a lethal injection drug protocol in Baze v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 8:39 am
Versiglio v. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 10:00 pm
And the Strasbourg Court has stated unambiguously that it regards the strictest institution permitted by UK law, the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC), to be a ”fully independent court” which is best placed to ensure that no material was unnecessarily withheld from the detainee (A v United Kingdom 49 EHRR 695). [read post]
