Search for: "People v McDonald" Results 401 - 420 of 882
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2015, 11:31 am by Schachtman
” See Corbett McDonald, “Silica and Lung Cancer: Hazard or Risk,” 44 Ann. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 5:28 am by Nick Hilborne, Litigation Futures
” The Supreme Court heard in McDonald v The National Grid Electricity Transmission plc [2014] UKSC 53, that Percy McDonald died of mesothelioma at the beginning of this year. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 4:11 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Defendant's motion to preclude impeachment evidence, People v Sandoval 34 NY2d 371 (1974), and evidence-in-chief of prior bad acts, People v Ventimiglia 52 NY2d 350 (1981), is referred to the trial court for hearings immediately prior to trial. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 3:55 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Thus, "banning from the home the most preferred firearm in the nation to keep' and use for protection of one's home and family,' [ Parker v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 3:49 pm by Stephen Bilkis
"], lv to appeal denied, 13 NY3d 748 [2009]; People v Abdullah, 23 Misc 3d 232, 234 (Crim Ct, Kings County 2008] ["Because New York does not have a complete ban on the possession of handguns in the home... [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 11:33 am by Stephen Bilkis
2011 NY Slip Op 21015 The People of the State of New York v. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 2:25 pm by Giles Peaker
Parliament has further expressly provided, in sections 15 and 35, for disabled people to have rights in respect of the accommodation which they occupy which are different from and extra to the rights of non-disabled people. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 9:36 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The fact that the media has latched on to that demonstrates how exceptional that is v. common fannish gift economies. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 12:23 pm
For federal opinions that say that people can regain their Second Amendment rights in such situations (though without holding that the particular claimant regained those rights), see United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 9:21 am by Nassiri Law
In Betts .v McDonald’s Corp., a large restaurant chain was named as a defendant by 10 Hispanic and African American men who allege their termination by a franchisee of three Virginia-based restaurants amounts to racial discrimination. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 9:58 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Xiyin Tang, Against Fair Use: The Case for Genericide Defenses in Artistic Works Rogers v. [read post]