Search for: "People v. Justice"
Results 401 - 420
of 25,629
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2019, 8:05 am
Justice Alito with opinion in Nielsen v. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 4:30 am
In Connick v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 4:00 am
People can manage their electronic records management systems in any way they wish, good or bad. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 6:30 am
” Compared with many poor people in New York state’s criminal justice system, Avery had it easy. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 12:29 pm
(People v. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 10:47 am
In 2015 in Glossip v. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 6:01 pm
It's as good a reason as any -- or at least good enough -- to publish an opinion merely to put to rest meritless arguments that nonetheless seem to be repeatedly raised in the Court of AppealOr, as Justice Scotland puts it so artfully here: "Our point in publishing this opinion is to say in no uncertain terms that a moribund claim like that raised by defendant has breathed its last breath. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 2:50 pm
You can tell this case took a long time to work its way through the criminal justice system because one of the principal issues on appeal is whether it was permissible to introduce the alleged gang member defendant's MySpace page at his trial.I'm not thinking that there are many "original O.G.'s" with MySpace pages anymore.Even fewer after this opinion. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 7:54 pm
I'm on board for what Justice Cooper says here. [read post]
22 May 2013, 9:55 am
When you are a repeat player in the justice system, you've got to do better than this.If you are the California Attorney General, there are so many better vehicles for getting your point across rather than taking this particular case up in appeal. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 11:38 am
I liked this footnote by Justice O'Rourke (in a case involving the extended committment of a mentally challenged individual):"The term 'mentally retarded person' is used in Welfare and Institutions Code section 6500, which is the statute providing the grounds for Hartshorn's commitment. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 6:05 pm
Albeit one that only criminal lawyers in California -- or those cognizant of this field -- would find interesting, or (potentially) even understand:If it ain't a wobbler, or at least a stealth wobbler, you can't knock it down to a misdemeanor.Read Justice Aronson's opinion for the nine-page version. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 3:51 pm
"I'm not sure that Justice Stewart needs to say both "needlessly and senselessly". [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 2:39 pm
So holds Justice Gilbert. [read post]
13 Aug 2007, 1:21 pm
Thank you, Justice Werdegar. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 11:17 pm
Because it's the lowest form of juvenile humor, even though it was the only opinion published today by the California Court of Appeal, I promised myself I wasn't going to comment about the caption in this case.But then, on page four, I read this line by Justice Aaron: "Ralph saw Goodwillie put something down his pants. . . . [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 10:49 am
A spigot, PCV pipe, rubbing alcohol, grocery bags full of maijuana, and a crapload of butane is apparently pretty much all you need.Thanks for the step-by-step instructions, Justice Ruvolo! [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 8:33 am
Justice Wiley authors a lengthy opinion (for him) that discusses and applies 22 pages of legal doctrine. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 7:03 am
In Parents Involved in Community Schools v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 8:55 am
Robbins, 519 U.S. 452 (1997)Bowles v. [read post]
