Search for: "People v. Profit" Results 401 - 420 of 4,408
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2022, 8:38 am by Race to the Bottom
Even the Chamber of Digital Commerce notes in its amicus brief for SEC v. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 11:38 am by Saraphin Dhanani
’s arsenal of legal weapons: designating the Russian-backed separatist forces, the Donetsk People’s Militia and the Luhansk People’s Militia (collectively known as the Donbas People’s Militia) and their leaders, as foreign terrorist organizations (FTO) under Section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) as amended (codified at 8 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 1:55 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court’s 2021 decision in Goldman Sachs Group Inc. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 4:32 pm by Mark Walsh
And then it is on to the argument in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts Inc. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 6:05 am by Erin Carroll
And news organizations litigated landmark cases, like New York Times Co. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
Color-Blindness in University Admissions Will be Difficult to Enforce and Lead to Much More LitigationIn his dissent in Gritter v. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 8:13 pm by Florian Mueller
OPPO cases, as did the Munich I Regional Court about a month ago.In a jurisdictional decision, China's Supreme People's Court remained consistent with its OPPO v. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 12:09 pm by Giles Peaker
Acheampong v Roman (HOUSING – RENT REPAYMENT ORDER – the amount to be awarded) (2022) UKUT 239 (LC) Two joined appeals. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:12 pm by INFORRM
The book seeks to address questions of how copyright generates income and how distributions of profits are allocated in the publishing, film and music industries. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 11:16 am by Jonathan Bailey
However, that victory may be something of a Pyrrhic one, as the jury opted not to award Alexander a share of the profits. [read post]
2 Oct 2022, 5:12 pm by Aaron Moss
Ironically, that’s the one defense that, per the Supreme Court’s recent pronouncement in Google v. [read post]