Search for: "People v. Root"
Results 401 - 420
of 2,101
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2013, 2:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 May 2013, 10:02 am
Lancaster, in Clark v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 4:30 am
Recently, in Ezzo v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 8:40 am
These laws are relevant because of the USSC decision in Lawrence v. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 8:48 am
Just why do you people have it in for Dinkins, anyway? [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 11:33 am
In a recent landmark case, Pratten v. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 10:26 am
Biological Paternity Isn't Determinative - Cornelio v. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 11:07 pm
This is both a bad idea and is unlawful, as the Supreme Court explained in Biden v. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:08 pm
Redhail, and Turner v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 11:00 am
This argument is rooted primarily in Heckler v. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 4:08 am
Fox News has an op-ed from Barronelle Stutzman, the florist whose refusal on religious grounds to design flowers for a same-sex wedding is at the root of the cert petition in Arlene’s Flowers v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 9:30 pm
In United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2014, 9:15 am
[I]t will take a long and dogged struggle to root out radical obstructionism on the right, and the years ahead could yet see Tea Partiers succeed by default. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
In Hubbard v. [read post]
27 Nov 2016, 4:52 pm
The other time was in 2000; that election was resolved via the SCOTUS decison in Bush v Gore.All of this has us over here at the Law Blogger re-examining the indirect method by which we select our president through the electoral college.The electoral college is rooted in Article II of the United States Constitution, as fine-tuned by the Twelfth Amendment. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 5:18 am
I like seeing and talking to other people. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 12:49 pm
DocName=075000050HPt%2E+V&ActID=2086&ChapterID=59&SeqStart=6200000&SeqEnd=8675000 [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 4:18 am
That was the question posed by a case from the Oakland County Circuit Court that went to the Michigan Court of Appeals.Now, on last week's remand back to the Oakland County trial court, an evidentiary hearing will be conducted in the People v Carruthers case to determine whether the accused was using a "reasonable" amount of marijuana by baking the pot brownies.Earl Carruthers was charged with illegally manufacturing marijuana when pot brownies and several ounces of "loose"… [read post]
6 Mar 2025, 8:57 am
These are known as SLAPP suits, filed against people who publicly disparage or criticize individuals in a public form. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 9:30 pm
The book tells the fascinating story, involving cameo appearances of people like John W. [read post]
