Search for: "Phillips v. Phillips" Results 401 - 420 of 3,860
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2012, 9:06 am by ADeStefano
In Phillip v. 525 E. 80th Street Condominium, the First Department held that a plaintiff was entitled to summary judgment under Labor Law § 240(1) where he fell while unloading scaffolding material from a flatbed truck. [read post]
6 Jun 2006, 10:44 am
Here is a link to a Topeka Capital-Journal article (registration required) reporting that the Defender Project won a new trial from Judge Hood in State v. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 1:40 pm by CJLF Staff
  Illinois, along with several other states, have initiated the re-sentencing of those who received life terms as juveniles following the 2012 Supreme Court decision in Miller v. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 11:47 am
  He suggests that because the Supreme Court is unlikely to overrule McCleskey v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 2:42 am by sally
Supreme Court Gow v Grant (Scotland) [2012] UKSC 29 (24 May 2012) Phillips v Mulcaire (Rev 1) [2012] UKSC 28 (24 May 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) G1 v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 867 (04 July 2012) Daejan Properties Ltd v Campbell [2012] EWCA Civ 875 (19 June 2012) High Court (Chancery Division) Ampurius NU Homes Holdings Ltd v Telford Homes (Creekside) Ltd [2012] EWHC 1820 (Ch) (04 July 2012) Starbucks… [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 11:09 am by Karen E. Keller
The following claims were construed consistent with Phillips v. [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 5:21 am by Legal Talk Network
Arguments heard before the high court this week, pit tobacco giant, Phillip Morris against smokers. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:46 am
IPS involved a patent based on an application filed by Oatey in 1999 directed to outlet boxes for water for washing machines.The CAFC cited Phillips (citing Innova/Pure v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 4:53 pm by Kate
Links Jeremy Phillips Tom Ewing Richard Buttrick Duncan Bucknell [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 1:15 pm by Greenberg Glusker
Following yesterday’s decision of the Court of Appeal in Cussler v. [read post]