Search for: "RIDDLE v. STATE"
Results 401 - 420
of 503
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2010, 8:12 am
In a per curiam opinion (that either means one that nobody wants to admit to having written or it means that the panel wants to emphasize that it is speaking with one voice) Judges Martin, Boggs fergodssake, and Cole hold that police need some justification before breaking down the door and entering a private residence.The case is United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 3:23 pm
Robert Thomas, Tred Eyerly and I filed an amicus curiae brief in the case of Stop the Beach Renourishment v. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 12:46 am
My Damon Key colleagues Mark Murakami and Tred Eyerly and I have posted our forthcoming essay Of Woodchucks and Prune Yards: A View of Judicial Takings From the Trenches on SSRN here, containing our thoughts on Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 4:17 am
State Police, 71 F.3d 480, 482 (3d Cir. 1995) (citing Papachristou v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 8:43 am
Supreme Court in 1976 to reinstate the death penalty in Gregg v. [read post]
15 May 2010, 5:54 am
He currently is at Penn State. [read post]
3 May 2010, 11:59 am
TITLE: Capital Punishment on Trial SUBTITLE: Furman v. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 9:10 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 9:26 am
” The open and obvious doctrine first appeared 18 years ago in the Supreme Court case of Riddle v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 1:22 pm
Supreme Court decision Roper v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 9:36 am
"Canada is not supposed to be a police state. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 6:44 am
Scott Riddle, The Law Office of Scott B. [read post]
16 Jan 2010, 7:21 am
See Erwin v. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 9:17 pm
Rather that conceptualizing fairness in relation to States (developed v. developing), should we ask what international law can do to protect – or more importantly perhaps – to empower vulnerable communities? [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 12:34 pm
Brinegar v. [read post]
7 Nov 2009, 6:00 am
Suntrust Bank v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 9:11 am
Recently, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania addressed this issue again, in Riddle v. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 6:56 pm
Riddle v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 2:54 pm
See Hagen v. [read post]
