Search for: "Rent v. State"
Results 401 - 420
of 4,372
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2007, 5:25 am
(We'll get to that in a minute.)In Pultz v. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 5:00 pm
In Hopp v. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 3:33 pm
Further, while child related benefits might be ‘designed to meet the needs of the child’ (R (SG and Others)) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [ 2015 ] UKSC 16 ), this could include the child’s housing costs. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 12:51 pm
The Court cited the cases of United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 10:28 pm
PERS v. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 1:30 pm
Teresa Ward v LB Hillingdon. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 8:42 pm
Their neighbors complained about wild parties, loud music, and out-of-state vehicles coming and going at the houses. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 2:11 pm
In Atlantic City Housing Authority v. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 5:25 am
L.P. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 8:27 am
In Henry v. [read post]
2 May 2010, 6:20 am
To the case page for Rent-A-Center v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 12:54 pm
Alternatively, drawing on Thlimmenos v Greece (2001) 31 EHRR 15, the right is also violated “when states without an objective and reasonable justification fail to treat differently persons whose situations are significantly different”. [read post]
21 May 2012, 12:54 pm
Alternatively, drawing on Thlimmenos v Greece (2001) 31 EHRR 15, the right is also violated “when states without an objective and reasonable justification fail to treat differently persons whose situations are significantly different”. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 11:33 am
In United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 2:51 am
(citing Koester v. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 4:08 am
Rent consisted of ground rent of £100 per year, insurance premium, and the service charge. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 4:08 am
Rent consisted of ground rent of £100 per year, insurance premium, and the service charge. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 3:43 am
We think this is the first one and as Upper Tribunal decisions are binding on the RPT it is likely to be important.Parker v Waller & Ors [2012] UKUT 301 (LC) is an appeal against a Southern RPT decision to award 100% of the rent for the 12 months preceding an application by the tenants, some £15,423.63.The facts are fairly simple. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 3:43 am
We think this is the first one and as Upper Tribunal decisions are binding on the RPT it is likely to be important.Parker v Waller & Ors [2012] UKUT 301 (LC) is an appeal against a Southern RPT decision to award 100% of the rent for the 12 months preceding an application by the tenants, some £15,423.63.The facts are fairly simple. [read post]
22 Apr 2007, 4:39 am
Rent to own: Rent-A-Center, largest rent to own business, entered into a consent judgment with California over misrepresentation of the true costs of ownership. [read post]
