Search for: "Robert v. Department of Insurance"
Results 401 - 420
of 696
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2014, 9:53 am
For instance, back in 1985, Robert Levinson complained of a contract with the Eckerd Foundation for the management of the Okeechobee School for Boys in which “[v]irtually every” contract item concerned input activities and pertained to administrative/operational functions. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 4:13 am
In an unusual development in a closely watched case, K2 Investment Group, LLC v. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 10:47 am
Plaintiff complained to the New York City Department of Buildings, which issued a series of violations and "stop work" orders. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 11:53 am
Pottow, and Justice Department lawyer Curtis E. [read post]
11 Jan 2014, 9:09 pm
In Executive Benefits Insurance Agency v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 5:39 am
Moore and Robert S. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:04 pm
Stahl and Robert A. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 10:22 am
Officer Robert Chavez of the Deming Police Department sought the search warrant. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 4:14 am
Robert S. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
The Justice Department’s analysis states that since the Supreme Court’s 1910 ruling in Hass v Henkel and its 1924 ruling in Hammererschmidt v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 7:42 am
In Tuesday’s argument in Heimeshoff v. [read post]
13 Oct 2013, 3:36 pm
In Roberts v. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 9:35 am
Likewise, in Police Department of Chicago v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 1:23 pm
Sebelius, where Chief Justice John Roberts voted to uphold the individual health insurance mandate as a tax, while other conservative justices voted to strike it down. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 8:10 pm
The Solicitor General was pressed on this letter repeatedly by Justices Roberts, Kagan, and Breyer. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 11:30 pm
As Chief Justice John Roberts presciently noted in his NIFB majority: “The States are separate and independent sovereigns. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 9:26 am
See Robert, 507 F.3d 981, 989-993;Friedrich v. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 5:10 pm
Robert La Courciere, et al. [read post]
28 Jul 2013, 8:57 am
Medrick v. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 4:37 am
The Appellate Division's 3rd Department rejected Kigin's challenge to the board's pre-authorization scheme, arguing that the board had exceeded the Legislature's grant of authority in enacting the regulations, and that the regulations were in conflict with their enabling legislation. [read post]
