Search for: "Rules of Evidence v. Rules" Results 401 - 420 of 59,336
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2024, 5:37 am by Chris Castle
These Phonorecords IV rates are in effect for five years, but the next negotiation for new rates is coming soon (called Phonorecords V or PR V for short). [read post]
However, admissibility of scientific evidence is generally governed by FRE 702, along with precedent in Frye v. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 4:42 pm by Earl Drott
However, as demonstrated in a recent Texas ruling issued in a truck accident case, JNM Express, et al. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am by admin
There was epidemiologic evidence on silicone and connective tissue disease before the Oregon federal district court and its technical advisors, and the court resoundingly rejected the plaintiffs’ causal claims as unsupported by valid evidence, with or without epidemiologic evidence. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 1:45 am by Frank Cranmer
The parties could not afford an expert to provide evidence to the court, which ruled in the mother’s favour as the child’s primary carer. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:40 pm by Marty Lederman
 The holdings of the principal cases Trump cites for the "clear statement" rule, especially Franklin v. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 12:16 pm by Russell Knight
There has to be evidence of the reliance on the promise. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 10:02 am by John Floyd
    Stale evidence, especially testimony recollected years later, is easily manipulated, and when there is no evidence to manipulate, other evidence can be manufactured. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
This is why, when reviewing a district court's ruling on a motion for judgment as a matter of law, we "disregard all evidence favorable to the moving party that the jury was not required to believe. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 1:55 pm by Orin S. Kerr
Last October, I wrote a long post on a new Tenth Circuit decision, United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 9:08 am by John Elwood
Veterans Joshua Bufkin and Norman Thornton were each denied benefits despite evidence that appeared to be in “approximate balance. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 3:35 am by SHG
The only evidence against defendant was the complainants’ testimony, and the result of the court’s rulings, on the one hand, was to bolster their credibility and diminish defendant’s character before the jury. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm by The Regulatory Review
The regulation is part of an effort to preserve the reproductive rights of women in the aftermath of the overturning of Roe v. [read post]