Search for: "SEALED APPELLANT 1"
Results 401 - 420
of 680
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2013, 10:01 am
Clintwood Elkhorn Mining Co., 553 U.S. 1, 11 (2008). [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 5:03 pm
The conviction was later dismissed and the record sealed. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 3:59 pm
Pursuant to CPL 160.50, subd. 1(c), the records subject to a sealing order include "all official records and papers relating to the arrest or prosecution. [read post]
24 Aug 2013, 2:52 am
Similarly, most exhibits attached to pre-trial and post-trial motions were ordered unsealed.The unusual posture:These appeals are unique in that neither the appellant, Apple, nor the cross-appellant, Samsung, opposes the other party’s requested relief. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 4:03 pm
Sealed Appellant v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 11:00 am
Encoding information can keep it secret and sealed. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 6:53 am
Thus, the objectives of a regulation are relevant in order to establish the existence of de facto discrimination as part of the analysis under Article I:1 or III of the GATT 1994. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 6:48 am
From the EU response to the Seal Products panel's second set of questions: Question 127 (All parties) Is the scope of "product characteristics or their related processes and production methods" in TBT Annex 1:1 limited to physical qualities, whether intrinsic or extrinsic, of a product? [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 6:47 am
From the EU response to the Seal Products panel's first set of questions: Question 43 (All parties) What aspects of the EU Seal Regime should be examined for the necessity test under Article XX(a) and XX(b) of the GATT 1994? [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 6:44 am
As mentioned before, Articles 2.1 and 2.2 of the TBT Agreement (like Articles I:1, III:4 and XX of the GATT 1994) are intended to strike a balance between trade liberalisation and regulatory autonomy. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 9:27 am
Further, it would make no sense whatsoever to conclude that Articles I:1 and III:4 of the GATT 1994 prohibit what is consistent under Article 2.1 of the TBT Agreement, as this would make Article 2.1 of the TBT Agreement and the balanced interpretation of that provision carefully developed by the Appellate Body utterly useless. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:10 am
1. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 1:56 pm
There are three levels of risk: (1) low; (2) moderate; and (3) high. [read post]
8 Jun 2013, 6:56 pm
Moreover, K.S.A. 60-1507(f)(1)(i) requires a motion to be filed within 1 year of "[t]he final order of the last appellate court in this state to exercise jurisdiction on a direct appeal or the termination of such appellate jurisdiction." [read post]
31 May 2013, 5:48 pm
There is no appellate authority squarely addressing the admissibility of DMV abstracts. [read post]
23 May 2013, 11:03 am
The group argued no FOIA exemption prevented disclosure of the images and disputed whether the CIA observed proper protocol when it initially classified the photos.United States District Court for the District of Columbia Judge James Boasberg last year sided with the government (see "TUOL" posts 1/14/13, 4/27/12 & 1/30/12). [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 5:16 am
As to the first issue, the judge noted that Rule 41(b)(1) “allows a . . . [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 6:38 am
What further clarification will the Appellate Body offer us in the event of an appeal in the Seal Products case? [read post]
30 Mar 2013, 12:01 pm
These features are also related in particular to the functions of “volume” and “sealing” which were emphasized by the appellant as being essential for the invention. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 10:49 pm
Apple says that any appeals it (or its rival Samsung) might bring at this point with respect to the March 1 damages order would be doomed to fail, the result being nothing but further delay:"Apple takes seriously the Court’s encouragement, but after careful analysis, Apple believes that until the damages retrial is held and supplemental damages are decided, appellate review of the March 1 Order will not be obtainable. [read post]
