Search for: "STARKS v. THE STATE" Results 401 - 420 of 1,625
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2013, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
In exempting the ‘slave’ victim from the protection of the common law of battery as the state Supreme Court had done in State v. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 2:53 pm by anbrandon
Two decisions in the last week at the Sixth Circuit exemplify this murkiness, revealing stark divisions within the appeals court and unusual allegiances among the judges.Perhaps most notably, last Friday's decision in United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 2:05 am by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal has handed down judgment in Lloyd v Google LLC [2019] EWCA Civ 1599, a decision with significant implications for data protection law and practice. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 3:01 am by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal today handed down judgment in the case of JIH v News Group Newspapers Ltd ([2011] EWCA Civ 42). [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 3:11 am by Scott Bomboy
Significant past Supreme Court decisions about tribal fishing rights include United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 10:31 am
The same patent was previously held invalid by the UK Courts for lack of novelty as a result an invalid priority right in Novartis v Hospira (see [2013 EWCA 516 (Pat.) and [2013] EWCA Civ 1663). [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 4:37 am by Edith Roberts
On Wednesday, the court heard argument in Salman v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 8:10 am
  Those adverse decisions were based on pre-Bauman Delaware state law, Sternberg v. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 9:53 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
MPI Release Technologies, LLC is a stark reminder of a trade secrets suit gone horribly wrong. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 1:50 am by Rosalind English
Carnwath LJ agreed: The stark message to an ordinary listener of statement 1 (“every Muslim should be a terrorist to every anti-social element”) is hardly mitigated by the explanatory reasoning which surrounds it. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 9:01 am by Ronald Mann
ShareThe justices took the easy and simple path in Siegel v. [read post]