Search for: "STATE EX REL. v. Court of Appeals"
Results 401 - 420
of 2,045
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2019, 9:38 am
State v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 8:13 pm
G.G. ex rel. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 12:34 pm
This term, the Court will hear argument from IJ's educational choice team in Espinoza v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:58 am
The Eighth District Court of Appeals unanimously affirmed the trial court’s ruling, holding that Article II, Section 34 of the Ohio Constitution did not give the General Assembly power to enact R.C. 9.75 and that the statute infringed upon the municipal home-rule authority granted in Article XVIII, Section 3. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 8:29 am
In State ex. rel. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 6:38 am
Kenny A., ex rel. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 11:43 am
The case is the United States and State of California ex rel. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:02 pm
Ex. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 6:35 am
Kenny A., ex rel. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 2:39 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in 2016. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 11:30 am
Citing Vincennes Univ. ex rel. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 8:54 am
Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 6:25 am
State ex rel Carver v. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 9:44 am
The trial court rejected plaintiff's Batson argument on this point, and the Court of Appeals rules the district court's determination was not an abuse of discretion. [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 1:28 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 11:37 am
In United States ex rel. [read post]
10 Aug 2019, 10:54 am
The Court of Appeals noted the tension between local zoning authority and State advocacy of a renewable energy agenda. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am
It’s Not Clear How They Would Do That Center for Responsive Politics – Jessica Piper | Published: 8/2/2019 Matching – when campaigns tell donors that their contributions will be equaled or multiplied by an unknown source – has emerged as a relatively common fundraising tool among groups across the political spectrum in recent years. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 6:31 am
The ICPC does not apply to A[t]he sending or bringing of a child into a receiving state by his parent, step‑parent, grandparent, adult brother or sister, adult uncle or aunt, or his guardian and leaving the child with any such relative or non‑agency guardian in the receiving state@ (Social Services Law '374Ba, Article VIII). [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 7:10 am
The case at issue is State ex rel. [read post]
