Search for: "STATE v LANCE"
Results 401 - 420
of 442
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2013, 9:54 am
The argument in Bond v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 9:11 am
CRA’s Policy Statement CPS-022 – on Political Activities – states that an activity is “political” if the charity: 1. explicitly communicates a call to political action (i.e., encourages the public to contact an elected representative or public official and urges them to retain, oppose, or change the law, policy, or decision of any level of government in Canada or a foreign country); 1. lance explicitement un appel à l’action politique… [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 8:00 am
Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 7:56 am
Grama (Purdue IT), David Hoffman (Intel), Lance Hoffman (GWU Computer Science), Joanne McNabb (Cal Dept. of Consumer Affairs), Lisa S. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 3:17 am
The trial of the United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 8:54 am
” 1863: The New Zealand Settlements Act, which authorized the government to confiscate land from certain tribes without compensation, was passed. 1877: In Wi Parata v The Bishop of Wellington, the chief justice of the Supreme Court declared the Treaty to be “worthless” and a “simple nullity. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 4:30 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ACTA continues to be discussed and debated: (Michael Geist), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Public Knowledge), (Techdirt), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), Apotex challenge to Acular LS patent barred by res judicata: Roche Palo Alto & Allergan v Apotex:… [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 5:04 pm
“We continue to focus on transnational repression, where Chinese authorities have reached into the United States and other countries to repress people critical of Chinese policies. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 6:22 am
publication of this classic book (Foundation Press, 2001), although highly influential through its use as a classroom text at Harvard Law School, and passed around in (unpublished) manuscript form, the authors simply couldn’t bring themselves to publish this book because, anchored as it was in the structural/process liberalism of the new administrative state, it had almost nothing to say about Brown v. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 3:48 pm
(Aguilar v. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:03 pm
Steel Corp. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 10:58 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 8:24 pm
The employee filed a human rights complaint in Wood v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 11:00 am
(Some requirements for expert testimony really are substantive state law, but that is a different issue.) [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 2:00 pm
Mitchell Miller and Lance H. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 10:41 am
Me.) in Cheng v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 4:55 am
The Lanham Act arose in the gamespace during 2009’s James “Jim" Brown v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 10:28 am
The Court, in deciding this case, is not likely to reopen its 1872 precedent in United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 1:03 pm
The pending Dukes v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 7:21 am
Costs v. [read post]
