Search for: "STATE v. KEEN" Results 401 - 420 of 906
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
On August 24, 2015, the Third Circuit United States Court of Appeals issued its ruling in the case FTC v. [read post]
Lord Neuberger was also keen to stress that commercial common sense (which had been applied in Rainy Sky SA v Kookmin Bank [2011] UKSC 50 where there was ambiguity in the interpretation of a clause) should not be “invoked to undervalue the importance of the language of the provision which is to be construed”. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 7:15 am by Barry Sookman
Slater decided that his future lay in emigrating to the United States, he faced such draconian trade-secrets laws in his native Britain (which tried to enforce them in a failed attempt to prevent new technology from arriving to the United States) that he had to keep his travel plans secret from family and friends, and disguise himself as a farm labourer. [read post]
26 Dec 2015, 6:06 am by Lyle Denniston
 The federal government said that, because it has many dealings with Puerto Rico, it has a keen interest in its legal status. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 3:25 am by Nick Armstrong, Matrix
Lord Neuberger was particularly keen that experimental policies not be deterred: para [97]. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 3:00 am by Daphne Keller
This is one of a series of posts about the pending EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), and its consequences for intermediaries and user speech online. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 12:15 pm by John Elwood
United States, 14-150; potential blockbuster Friedrichs v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
Keene Corp., 628 A.2d 710, 717-19 (N.J. 1993); Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 4:59 am
The defendant, Mark Towle, created life-like replicas of the Batmobile features in the TV series and the movie as a part of his business Gotham Garage, selling them to car collectors with a keen interest in Batman. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 5:32 am
As Justice Mustang wrote for the Untied States Supreme Court in in the semenal 2010 case of Clouseau v. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 1:00 am by Ryan Dolby-Stevens, Olswang LLP
In the Court of Appeal, the court considered the development of the case law, especially the recent cases of Murray v Leisureplay Plc [2005] EWCA Civ 963 and El Makdessi v Cavendish Square Holdings BV [2013] EWCA Civ 1539, stating (per Lord Justice Moore-Bick at paragraph 21): “[T]he modern cases thus appear to accept that a clause providing for payment on a breach of a sum of money that exceeds the amount that a court would award as compensation…may not be… [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 7:05 am by Laura Stefani
That decision was reversed by the full NTSB on relatively narrow grounds not relating to the FAA’s “commercial v. recreational” distinction, and the case was eventually settled, with the drone operator admitting to no violations of any rules. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 7:22 pm by Bill Marler
Elder RO, Keen JE, Siragusa GR, Barkocy-Gallagher GA, Koohmaraie M, and Laegreid WW. (2000). [read post]
Wyndham Worldwide – What it Means for Hotel Owners by Bob Braun, Hotel Lawyer and Data Security Advisor Background on the case On August 24, 2015, the Third Circuit United States Court of Appeals issued its ruling in the case FTC v. [read post]
Wyndham Worldwide – What it Means for Hotel Owners by Bob Braun, Hotel Lawyer and Data Security Advisor Background on the case On August 24, 2015, the Third Circuit United States Court of Appeals issued its ruling in the case FTC v. [read post]