Search for: "STATE v. PATRON"
Results 401 - 420
of 1,250
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2017, 5:05 pm
Numerous federal, state and local statutes prohibit public officials from accepting anything of value precisely because the quid pro quo is never stated but always understood. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 7:00 am
Simon Stern The government’s motion to dismiss in CREW v. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 6:45 am
Colorado & Madden v. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 1:27 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit’s decision in International Refugee Assistance Project v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 9:37 am
Some states do read their public accommodations statutes as requiring religious exemptions, see, e.g., Yeager v. [read post]
21 May 2017, 9:35 pm
Additionally, numerous states followed by changing their laws to allow in-state investment crowdfunding. [read post]
18 May 2017, 8:15 am
Additional Resources: Barnwell v. [read post]
15 May 2017, 2:16 pm
On April 25, 2017, the Supreme Court decided Lewis v. [read post]
14 May 2017, 5:28 pm
In Obergefell v. [read post]
14 May 2017, 4:55 am
MCAD v. [read post]
11 May 2017, 7:07 pm
” When Melngailis decided to reboot the business, she asked for help, and her former patrons obliged. [read post]
2 May 2017, 8:31 am
Additional Resources: Terry v. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 3:19 pm
In the seminal 1990 case on tip-pooling, Leighton v. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 3:19 pm
In the seminal 1990 case on tip-pooling, Leighton v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 7:58 am
Justices Thomas and Ginsburg wrote separate brief opinions concurring in the judgment (Lewis v. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 1:35 pm
Tuesday morning’s argument in Bristol-Myers Squibb v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 7:37 am
Oaklawn Jockey Club, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 4:43 am
Mason v. [read post]
23 Apr 2017, 1:18 pm
The Court of Appeals held that the owners did not owe such a duty, and refused to hold a garage operator liable for the acts of its patrons. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 10:32 am
In Sherley v. [read post]
