Search for: "STATE v. TRACY" Results 401 - 420 of 462
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2007, 12:21 am
Kamins was the lead plaintiff in the case, Connection Distributing Co., et al. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 3:27 pm by Jamie Baker
Professor Loewy’s article Statutory Rape in a Post Lawrence v. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 7:29 pm
Kamins was the lead plaintiff in the case, Connection Distributing Co., et al. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
White Coats in the State Capital: OB-GYNs become political force in abortion wars Yahoo News – Alice Miranda Ollstein and Megan Messerly (Politico) | Published: 8/22/2022 Physicians, many of whom have never mobilized politically, are banding together in the wake of the Supreme Court overturning Roe v. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
: Peer International Corporation, Southern Music Publishing Co and Peermusic (UK) Ltd v Editoria Musical de Cuba (IP finance) Justice Kitchin upholds British Beer and Pub Association and British Hospitality Association appeal against decision of Copyright Tribunal on basis for calculation of fees which members have to pay for background music (IPKat) Contempt of court: the risks of false testimony in trade mark infringement proceedings: KJM Superbikes Ltd v Hinton (IPKat) (IPKat)… [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 1:51 pm by WSLL
Murphy of Williams, Porter, Day & Neville, P.C., Casper, WyomingRepresenting Appellee (Defendant):  Tracy J. [read post]
This smaller design would send 6,000 cubic feet of water per second from the Sacramento River, through a tunnel 150 feet below the Delta, to the Tracy intake pumps. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 2:37 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  CTRL-C and CTRL-V are considered sacred symbols. [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 8:51 am by Patrick Hindert
Sioteco case where a California appellate court reversed earlier Fresno County trial court decisions and declared that public policy now supports state court approved factoring transactions. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 11:47 am by Guest Author
That was the first precedential decision of the Board on this subject following the California Supreme Court’s decision in Metropolitan Water District v. [read post]