Search for: "Sayed v. Page"
Results 401 - 420
of 12,117
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2023, 8:35 am
In United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 12:37 pm
Three years ago, when the Court of Appeal struck down Section 1814 of the Insurance Code, which prohibits bail companies from paying inmates from referring potential customers, as an unconstitutional infringement of free speech, I was skeptical, saying (among other things):Letting bail agents make "arrangements" with inmates to refer clients to 'em clearly, in my view, distorts the marketplace, and punishing such conduct will lead to a marketplace more closely (albeit… [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 9:41 am
From Hakim v. [read post]
D.C. Circuit Review – Reviewed: selective prosecution under § 1983, January 6 sentencings, and more.
23 Aug 2023, 7:55 pm
Judge Wilkins concurred in the judgment, issuing a three-page opinion. [read post]
D.C. Circuit Review – Reviewed: selective prosecution under § 1983, January 6 sentencings, and more.
23 Aug 2023, 7:55 pm
Judge Wilkins concurred in the judgment, issuing a three-page opinion. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 7:38 pm
” Judge Legg reported last week on Dinnena v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 5:01 am
Yet the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, unlike some state court rules, say little to answer this question. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
By Eric SegallI had an existential crisis in the Spring of 2012, just a few months before the hugely important Affordable Care Act case, NFIB v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 3:37 pm
From McCollum v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 6:06 am
Johnson once quipped, “In my part of the country there is an old saying that the town which can’t support one lawyer can always support two lawyers. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 2:57 pm
In fact, the Court conceded that Dollis’s “embrace of an ultimate employment decision rule was based on a misinterpretation” of dicta from a 1981 Fourth Circuit case, Page v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 10:26 am
So if you've got a couple of spare hours to read 70 or so pages of legal theory, seriously, I recommend the thing.The only thing I wanted to talk about in detail, though, is footnote six. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 7:32 am
The court says the 32/58 video comparison was too small a sample to generate reliable results. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 4:05 am
In Satz v. [read post]
19 Aug 2023, 4:49 pm
Cal.) in Crowley v. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 4:30 am
A fairly remarkable example is Johnson v. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 3:00 am
Or so said the Texas Court of Appeals (Amarillo) in Boes v. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 4:55 pm
The case is Esper v NHS North West London Integrated Care Board [2023] EWCOP 29; [2023] WLR(D) 300, and is a decision of Mr Justice Poole. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 11:57 am
From Doe v. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 8:22 am
Steiner * Vague Takedown Notice Targeting Facebook Page Results in Possible Liability–CrossFit v. [read post]
