Search for: "Shelby v. State" Results 401 - 420 of 726
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  This provision, and not Civil Service Law § 72, applies under the circumstances because a more general statute generally must yield to a more specific statute (Matter of Zelazny Family Enters., LLC v Town of Shelby, 180 AD3d 45, 48 [4th Dept 2019]; McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 1, Statutes § 397). [read post]
20 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  This provision, and not Civil Service Law § 72, applies under the circumstances because a more general statute generally must yield to a more specific statute (Matter of Zelazny Family Enters., LLC v Town of Shelby, 180 AD3d 45, 48 [4th Dept 2019]; McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 1, Statutes § 397). [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 6:37 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
[v] South Dakota: American indigenous peoples comprise 27 percent of the South Dakota prison population, the highest proportion of any state in the country. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 4:39 am by Amy Howe
  The Court ruled in favor of the firm’s clients last summer, in Shelby County v. [read post]
10 May 2017, 6:26 am by Kate Howard
North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP 16-833 Issues: (1) Whether a federal court has the authority to re-impose, under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, the same “anti-retrogression” preclearance standard invalidated as to Section 5 by Shelby County v. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
" And, in our times, Citizens United and its progeny, along with Shelby County v. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 5:37 am by SHG
Rather, the concern comes after Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act was held unconstitutional in Shelby County v. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 7:44 am by Steven Schwinn
But given the way this court has ruled in recent federalism cases (like Shelby County v. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 8:45 am by Kate Howard
North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP 16-833 Issues: (1) Whether a federal court has the authority to reimpose, under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, the same “anti-retrogression” preclearance standard invalidated as to Section 5 by Shelby County v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 9:11 am by John Elwood
United States, 14-5227, and Freidus v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  When the working class threatened the interests of robber barons in late nineteenth century, for example, the illiterate and semiliterate poor were kept from the polls through literacy tests and poll taxes, not unlike the restrictive voter identification laws introduced after the Shelby County v. [read post]