Search for: "Short v. United States"
Results 401 - 420
of 10,067
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Sep 2023, 10:30 pm
On Tuesday, "[a]fter carefully considering the briefing and conducting oral argument on August 3, 2023," Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted Qualcomm's motion for summary judgment in its entirety: In Re: Qualcomm Antitrust Litigation (case no. 17-md-02773-JSC, N.D. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 7:21 pm
Worldwide, non-O157 STEC outbreaks emerged in the 1980s, and the first reported outbreaks in the United States occurred in the 1990s. [57, 55] The number of reported outbreaks due to non-O157 STECs remains relatively low in the United States, but experts agree that documented outbreaks probably represent the “tip of the iceberg. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 3:00 pm
In Huck v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 4:10 am
Ohioans United for Reproductive Rights v. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 5:42 am
But what about the employee who is assigned to work abroad on a short-term basis and reports at all times back to the United States? [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
United States, 379 U.S. 241 (1964), but this time the U.S. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 3:18 am
BYLT Performance LLC v. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 7:42 am
[I will blog the NetChoice v. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 6:07 am
According to plaintiffs, the LESMC "denounces capitalism, the nuclear family, and the territorial integrity of the lower 48 states of the United States[,]" and is designed "to expunge the idea of Zionism, and the legitimacy of the existence of the State of Israel, from the public square[.] [read post]
17 Sep 2023, 9:48 am
Susan V. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
Part 1 of this piece can be found here. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 10:38 pm
Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California just denied in part--and in economic terms, almost completely--a U.S. antitrust class action brought on behalf of leading French publishers such as Le Figaro and L'Équipe (about that one, see my personal note toward the end). [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 1:46 pm
United States, 492 F.3d 1308 (Fed. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
” In 2021 we published an article concluding “that the President is not a Section 3 ‘officer of the United States. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
In 1972, the per se flood crested in U.S. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 7:35 pm
Calabresi now agrees with Tillman that the President is not an "Officer of the United States. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 10:24 pm
Part V considers another threshold question: was Trump ever subject to Section 3? [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 9:57 am
See also, Safer Chemicals, Healthy Families v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 9:01 am
” Plaintiff only brokers real estate in the state of Texas, but it has clients throughout the United States and in other countries. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
During my recent visit to Columbia Law School, Professor John Coffee shared with me a draft of a short article that later appeared in the New York Law Journal.[1] Coffee’s article assessed the prospects in the U.S. [read post]
