Search for: "Southern States Holding, Inc."
Results 401 - 420
of 1,777
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2018, 6:09 am
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 8:37 am
NAF Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 2:00 am
District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 1:55 pm
See United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 3:56 am
Snowizard Holdings, Inc., Cancellation No. 92044522 (December 10, 2009) [not precedential]. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 1:25 am
Svces Inc. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 1:25 am
Svces Inc. v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 11:49 am
In one case, a judge in the Southern District of New York on May 8 denied class certification (See here) for a group of magazine interns, holding that the interns failed to meet the commonality and predominance requirements of Rule 23. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 1:13 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 3:54 pm
’” United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 6:13 am
The SDHR can hold an evidentiary hearing to get to the bottom of things. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 1:33 pm
The other two projects were: 1) Southern Company Services, Inc. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 9:05 am
They will be holding educational events and publishing ads on social media. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 12:31 pm
Appealed from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 7:17 am
The Second Circuit affirmed, stating in essence that, while a written litigation hold notice may be reasonable in most cases, the failure to issue such a notice (or one specifying particular files) is not necessarily negligent, much less grossly negligent per se. [read post]
6 May 2021, 2:41 pm
On Wednesday, a federal judge in Texas denied Factory Mutual’s Rule 12(c) motion for judgment on the pleadings, finding that the plaintiffs adequately alleged that the presence of COVID-19 on their property caused covered physical loss or damage in the case of Cinemark Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 5:03 pm
An administrative hearing officer upheld the suspension, determining the arresting officer complied with state regulations requiring a 15-minute period of continuous observation before administering a breath test (Cal. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 6:38 pm
Southern Pac. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 10:23 am
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (1984). [read post]
17 May 2018, 8:36 am
Int’l Bank of Commerce to “hold that arbitrability is a ‘threshold question’ to be determined ‘at the outset,’ a holding consistent with the ‘national policy favoring arbitration. [read post]
