Search for: "State v Exxon" Results 401 - 420 of 549
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2010, 6:00 am by Bruce Nye
Exxon Mobil Corporation (2009) -- caution, not citeable -- 102 Cal.Rptr. 3d 311:  she wrote the decision in which her panel held that punitive damages are assignable if the cause of action they are attached to is assignable.Patterson v. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 11:35 am
Supreme Court was the decision to permit federal preemption in the Riegel v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 5:39 am by Jack Goldsmith
[Jack Goldsmith and I will have an article out about the Dormant Commerce Clause, geolocation, and state regulations of Internet transactions in the Texas Law Review early next year, and I'm serializing it here. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 12:56 am
A ruling Wednesday by a judge granting the defense judgment NOV in Nelson v. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 2:25 pm by Kenneth Anderson
by Kenneth Anderson It's likely old news to most OJ readers, but we should still note in passing that the DC Circuit, in a divided panel, handed down an important ATS case, John Doe VIII v Exxon Mobil Corp. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 5:30 am by Ben Cheng
Washington State Democratic Central Committee v. [read post]
28 May 2008, 11:21 am
  Conference of June 12, 2008 __________________   Docket: 07-81 Name: Exxon Mobil v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 6:19 am by James Bickford
Several senators are considering legislation that would overturn the 1:1 ratio of punitive to compensatory damages established in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 2:15 am by gmlevine
Although there is a history of invented words as trademarks – Xerox®, Exxon®, Kodak®, Viagra® – “State Far” is not such a one. [read post]