Search for: "State v. Congress"
Results 401 - 420
of 28,950
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2024, 12:19 pm
Sadly, since 2022’s ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 12:05 pm
Bembury v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 9:27 am
For more information on SEC v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 7:28 am
They are supported by Georgia and 18 other states. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 11:39 am
More than two decades after the shock of Bush v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 10:20 am
Section 702 Query Procedure Reform Congress recently added the requirement for query procedures to Section 702. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 6:31 am
And in 1982, in Nixon v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 6:26 am
The Supreme Court’s Muldrow v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 6:15 am
The case, Thaler v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
The Court explained that Congress “imposed liability for pure omissions in §11(a) of the Securities Act of 1933” by prohibiting “any registration statement that ‘contain[s] an untrue statement of a material fact or omit[s] to state a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein not misleading. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 10:31 am
United States Department of Interior, et al. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 7:16 am
§ 1512) that was at issue in yesterday's oral argument in Fischer v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
” Raskin is a former law professor (and one of the most astute legal minds in Congress) who has been very active in, among other things, the congressional investigation into events of Donald Trump and others on January 6, 2021.Just a few minutes into his prepared remarks, Raskin interrupted by seemingly pro-Palestinian protesters who shouted that Raskin is “complicit in genocide. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 4:27 pm
" Although most assume that means without authority of the Executive Branch, the Logan Act itself does not specify what this term means, and the State Department told Congress in 1975 that "Nothing in section 953 … would appear to restrict members of the Congress from engaging in discussions with foreign officials in pursuance of their legislative duties under the Constitution. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 1:34 pm
He noted that just last week, in Bissonnette v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 9:05 am
Congress Is Cutting It. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 8:41 am
Yesterday in my conflict of laws class I taught South Dakota v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 5:29 am
For example, in SEC v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
MARBURY V. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
In SEC v. [read post]
