Search for: "State v. E. N. W." Results 401 - 420 of 1,699
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2012, 1:15 pm by Bexis
“[W]e do not believe that a trial court in the context of a products liability action is the proper forum. . . . [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 10:20 am by Bexis
  Id. at 2477 (“[w]e reject this ‘stop-selling’ rationale as incompatible with our pre-emption jurisprudence”).However, in a footnote, the Court pointed out that the relevant state law (New Hampshire) used risk-utility balancing to determine design defect, and declined to speculate on other design-related product liability regimes:At least where a State imposes liability based on a balancing of a product's harms and benefits in light… [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 2:12 pm
The Court of Appeals then takes up Sewell’s argument, explaining that[w]e accept as true at this stage of the proceedings all facts alleged in Sewell's complaint. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 7:25 am
  For statute of limitations purposes, it is as if the voluntarily nonsuited case “never existed”:[W]e conclude that, when a plaintiff takes a voluntary nonsuit, it is as if the original suit was never initiated. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 5:34 am
Rund called his offense `really stupid,’ and said he was `really sorry,’ `kn[e]w what [he] did wasn't right,’ and `kn[e]w that it's a big deal and shouldn't be taken lightly,’ but he also said that the offense did not `reflect[ ] who I am. [read post]
25 May 2007, 4:24 am
Ikuta said that "[w]e conclude that Perfect 10 is unlikely to be able to overcome Google's fair use defense and, accordingly, we vacate the preliminary injunction regarding Google's use of thumbnail images. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 6:00 am by Janet Lindenmuth
In 1802 he sold the house and mills to Eleuthère Irénée du Pont, who founded his gunpowder mills there. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
[And] [n]otable state judicial review under state constitutions in fact predated the Philadelphia Convention, Federalist No. 78, and Marbury v. [read post]