Search for: "State v. Hale"
Results 401 - 420
of 974
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
" Among other heinous contributions, Hale is credited with furthering the legal rule that men cannot rape their wives and the practice of burning women at the stake when they are deemed (by men) to be witches.The citations in the draft opinion are staggering enough but, even after the world criticized Alito for including Hale in that draft, Hale still appeared in the final opinion in much the same manner. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 2:02 am
On Tuesday 4 March 2014 is the matter of R (George) v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 4:25 am
Baroness Hale specifically alerted at [35] to the very real problem of discrimination against gay people before stating that this was not happened in the present case. [read post]
21 May 2012, 6:42 am
Al-Sirri v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 14 – 15 May 2012. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 7:39 pm
The specter of Dunning School history haunted oral argument in Anderson v. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 1:16 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 1:59 pm
Stuart Hale Co., 1 F.3d 611, 618 (7th Cir. 1993). [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 10:45 am
On June 24, 2022, the United States Supreme Court reversed its 1973 decision in Roe v. [read post]
14 May 2011, 10:59 pm
Indiana Asserts Jurisdiction Over Ohio LawyerFoley v. [read post]
Case Comment: R (ZH and CN) v London Borough of Newham and London Borough of Lewisham [2014] UKSC 62
14 May 2015, 1:59 am
In Hounslow LBC v Powell; Leeds CC v Hall; Birmingham CC v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8; [2011] 2 AC 18; [2011] HLR 23, the decision in Pinnock was held to be of general application whenever a public authority seek possession of a property that constitutes a person’s home. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 3:26 am
Patmalniece (FC) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Respondent) [2011] UKSC 11 – Read judgment / press summary The Supreme Court has ruled that pensioners from other European Union states should not have the right to claim pension credits in the UK. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 11:31 am
” (slip op. at 23-24) (citing Strickland and United States v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 10:55 pm
The Court held that: Decisions weighing the public interest in deportation against the private interest of the appellant and his family in his private and family life are often difficult and cannot easily be categorised as perverse” [§23] Lord Justice Longmore referred to MA (Somalia) v SSHD [2010] UKSC 49 when the Supreme Court reminded the Court of Appeal that it: should not be astute to characterise as an error of law what is no more than a… [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:21 pm
See Ammerman v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 6:37 am
United States and Pleau v. [read post]
27 Sep 2012, 12:11 pm
V. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 1:00 am
Had they done so, Her Ladyship stated that she would have agreed with the minority decision in that case. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 3:00 am
At 11 a.m., the Court will hear argument in Cuomo v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:30 pm
Islam v Secretary of State for the Home Department, R v Immigration Appeal Tribunal and Another, ex parte Shah (1999) Nora Honkala72. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 6:33 am
United States, Shaw v. [read post]
