Search for: "State v. Harms"
Results 401 - 420
of 23,502
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2017, 8:14 am
Pennsylvania State Police, 603 Pa. 156, 983 A.2d 627, 637 (2009) (quoting Shambach v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 7:01 am
The Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts in Koshy v. [read post]
23 Oct 2022, 7:35 am
See Ermini v. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 8:07 am
The State Court of Appeals sustains some of these convictions, but it does something that courts have threatened to do for years: it strikes down the Aggravated Harassment law as unconstutitional.The case is People v. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 3:28 pm
In United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 9:04 am
“Gibbons v. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 6:23 am
Since that time, the Court has made it harder to regulate guns, as the Court in 2022 held in New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 1:22 pm
Adkins Holding: (1) The traditional business judgment rule applies to a disinterested and independent board of directors' refusal of a stockholder litigation demand, not the modified business judgment rule established in Boland v. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 11:57 am
In Gallon v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 8:18 am
Citing Barrett v. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 3:32 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 6:22 pm
SEC v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 6:45 am
In Obergefell v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 5:32 pm
Abbott is two consolidated cases that concern allegations that Texas lawmakers drew the state's federal congressional and state legislative districts in such a way as to harm the rights of the state's black and Hispanic voters. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 7:39 am
In doing so, Judge Sheridan relied on the recent decision by the United States Supreme Court in Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 10:15 am
In Stephenson v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
While the Supreme Court has not retreated from the core holding in Ferber, it has made shutting down the marketplace more difficult with its child pornography holdings in a series of cases, including United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 6:15 am
U.S. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 3:23 pm
’ This type of failure to take reasonable care and the resultant harm is the hallmark of negligence claims, and the count contains no demonstration of any intent to harm prescription drug users or, through them, the state. [read post]
30 May 2016, 8:04 am
Perhaps its time for Congress and the State legislatures to review these restrictions, and determine whether they do more harm than good. [read post]
