Search for: "State v. Kelly " Results 401 - 420 of 1,426
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2021, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Citing Matter of Baloy v Kelly, 92 AD3d 521, the Appellate Division opined that the possibility of Officer obtaining administrative relief was exhausted when Officer retired without a change in his modified status. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Citing Matter of Baloy v Kelly, 92 AD3d 521, the Appellate Division opined that the possibility of Officer obtaining administrative relief was exhausted when Officer retired without a change in his modified status. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Citing Matter of Baloy v Kelly, 92 AD3d 521, the Appellate Division opined that the possibility of Officer obtaining administrative relief was exhausted when Officer retired without a change in his modified status. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Citing Matter of Baloy v Kelly, 92 AD3d 521, the Appellate Division opined that the possibility of Officer obtaining administrative relief was exhausted when Officer retired without a change in his modified status. [read post]
26 Jul 2015, 5:19 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
Andreas School of Law Jeffrey Parness - Northern Illinois University College of Law Mary Ziegler - Florida State University College of Law Browne Lewis - Cleveland State University, Cleveland-Marshall College of Law Meredith Harbach - University of Richmond School of Law [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 7:30 am by Kelly Goles
He would later go on to successfully argue the case of Brown v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 4:54 pm by Madelaine Lane
  They pointed out that despite Chief Justice Kelly and Justice Hathaway’s assertions to the contrary, no other state has adopted this “appearance of impropriety” standard. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm by Julie Lam
  In an opinion authored by Justice Markman, and joined by Chief Justice Kelly, and Justices Cavanagh and Corrigan, the majority concluded that Frank had been unjustly enriched because he ;enjoyed sole ownership of the properties as a result of Janet’s maintenance payments, because they otherwise would have been subject to foreclosure. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
More than 1 million credit cards may have been compromised in Staples hack http://t.co/rk8yTIuxIn -> Sorry Google, This Isn't About SOPA, It's About You  http://t.co/rrFpjMkUq3 -> Koons Again Accused of Copyright Infringement http://t.co/iBwt0xVATP -> Internet Jurisdiction and the Microsoft Warrants http://t.co/4RnSCPFUl6 -> MEP Kelly settles copyright case with photographer http://t.co/5zPRpQyoot -> 'Whoomp! [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 7:56 am by Madelaine Lane
The Court also released Chief Justice Kelly’s concurring opinion in Duncan v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 7:34 am by Kiran Bhat
The Court heard arguments in two cases yesterday morning, with United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
Subscript Law has a graphic explainer for Monday’s opinion in Gamble v. [read post]