Search for: "State v. Louis D."
Results 401 - 420
of 822
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2014, 7:39 am
If you’ve got a piece of personal data that you’d like forgotten, all you have to do is fill out Google’s handy online form. [read post]
Limited Liability Companies Are like Corporations for Purposes of Determining Citizenship under CAFA
20 May 2014, 3:00 am
Heckemeyer v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 6:28 am
Take the case of Louis B. [read post]
8 May 2014, 12:44 pm
French, and Louis J. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 3:04 am
If you thought that the Google AdWords saga ended when the Court of Justice of the European Union (‘CJEU’) ruled that hosting keywords corresponding to trade marks does not amount to a “use in the course of trade” that the right owner can prevent [Google France v Louis Vuitton Mattelier, Joined Cases C-236/08 to C-238/08], then you may want to think twice. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 10:39 am
In Zinter v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 5:19 am
David Alvis, Jeremey D. [read post]
1 Feb 2014, 7:00 pm
Louis. [read post]
1 Feb 2014, 6:43 pm
Louis. [read post]
1 Feb 2014, 6:43 pm
Louis. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 3:35 am
The controlling interest in LBCC is held by Louis Thalheimer and his family members. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 8:30 am
It was Justice Louis Brandeis who mused that states could serve as laboratories for democracy, where they might try “novel social and economic experiments without risk to the rest of the country. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 8:38 am
If only he'd shown more verve and expanded the class of PIP beneficiaries. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 5:38 am
If only he’d shown more verve and expanded the class of PIP beneficiaries. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 9:00 am
Urofsky, Louis D. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 7:24 pm
But in Georgia v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:04 pm
Weaver, Professor of Law & Distinguished University Scholar, University of Louisville, Louis D. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 8:01 am
Just-released books Louis Fisher, On the Supreme Court: Without Illusion or Idolatry (Paradigm Publishers) Clarke D. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 5:23 am
The Appellate Division began with Puesan’s convictions for computer trespass, noting that "under Penal Law § 156.10,” the evidence must show he “`knowingly use[d] . . . or accesse[d] a computer . . . [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 6:08 am
See, e.g., Jewett V. [read post]
