Search for: "State v. Nicol" Results 401 - 420 of 1,034
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm by Schachtman
Indeed, their brief in other places states their opinion that significance testing is not necessary at all: “Testing for significance, however, is often mistaken for a sine qua non of scientific inference. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 1:33 pm
The unanimous affirmance was not unexpected in light of that fact that Nicole Saharsky, the Assistant to the Solicitor General who argued the case on behalf of the federal government, faced so few questions from the Justices that she used only seven of her allotted thirty minutes at oral argument. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm by Law Lady
Medicare Fraud: CLINIC OWNERS GET PRISON FOR STEALING MEDICARE FUNDS, United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 12:39 am
White, J.), rendered on or about October 11, 2005, unanimously affirmed. ... 11.. The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
More recently, in Ferdinand v MGN Limited [2011] EWHC 2454 (QB) Nicol J said that a substantial body of the public would consider that the England football captain fell within Buxton LJ’s list of “those from whom higher standards were expected”. [read post]
9 Oct 2021, 10:47 am by Emily Dai
And Robert Loeb and Cesar Lopez-Morales wrote about United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 6:46 pm by lawmrh
United States (11-182) — the Court instead unanimously vacated and remanded 8-0, FCC v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 3:45 pm by John A. Emmons
Anderson sat down with professors Chimène Keitner and Ingrid Wuerth to discuss oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 8:48 am by WSLL
Remanded in part.Case Name: WILSON ADVISORY COMMITTEE, a Wyoming Nonprofit Corporation v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
The Surprising Divide within the Baptist Community Concerning Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
On 10 March 2017, Nicol J granted what appears to be the first privacy injunction of 2017. [read post]