Search for: "State v. T. C." Results 401 - 420 of 17,165
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2024, 3:29 am by Verena von Bomhard (BomhardIP)
The other two are APE TEES (EUIPO v Nowhere, C-337/22 P) and SHOPPI (Shopify v EUIPO, C-751/22 P, see here and here)). [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 10:20 am by Eric Goldman
This is the kind of ambiguous generalization I see on Internet Law final exams that get a C. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 9:04 pm by Dan Flynn
Smith of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, who presided over United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 6:51 am by Dan Bressler
” “Comment 24 to Rule 1.7 states that ‘[t]he mere fact that advocating a legal position on behalf of one client might create precedent adverse to the interests of [another] client in an unrelated matter does not create a conflict of interest. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 3:00 am by jonathanturley
” She added “My colleagues gave me the Cliff Notes version [of the article about her advocacy] b/c I don’t read it [the Rover]. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 8:24 am by Tobin Admin
To reach this finding, the court applied the interpretation of § 51-1-11(c) found in the 2016 decision of Chrysler Grp., LLC v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 2:00 pm by Eugene Volokh
Kay also tweeted links to organizations providing Plan B and Plan C abortifacient pills. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:55 pm by Unknown
” The regulations under the statute state that gasoline blend stocks “means (A) Alkylate; (B) Butane; (C) Butene; . . . . [read post]