Search for: "State v. Tims" Results 401 - 420 of 1,360
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2019, 8:03 pm by Howard Bashman
Tim Ryan of Courthouse News Service reports that “High Court Weighs Extent of State Sovereignty. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 10:09 am by Florian Mueller
The Federal Trade Commission just submitted to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California its witness list for Day 4 of the FTC v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 2:35 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
24 Dec 2018, 3:02 am by Walter Olson
Practical difference between this and “…whenever they please” is not clear [Tim Carpenter, Topeka Capital-Journal] At Timbs v. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm by Schachtman
Indeed, their brief in other places states their opinion that significance testing is not necessary at all: “Testing for significance, however, is often mistaken for a sine qua non of scientific inference. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 4:01 am by Edith Roberts
” Kathryn Moore analyzes Wednesday’s argument in Culbertson v. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 6:10 pm by INFORRM
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 12:34 pm by Rachel Brown, Wenqing Zhao
Xu, a deputy division director with the MSS’s Jiangsu State Security Department, is the first Chinese intelligence officer to be extradited for prosecution in the United States. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 7:18 am by Chris Castle
(Spotify recently lost a motion to dismiss against Bluewater Music represented by attorney Richard Busch, see Order Denying Motion To Dismiss For Lack Of Standing And Failure To State A Claim, Sept. 29, 2018, Bluewater Music Services Corporation, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 6:24 am by Michael Risch
Tim Scott (King & Spalding) has published The Availability of Post-Sale Contractual Restrictions in the Wake of Impression Products, Inc. v. [read post]