Search for: "Stevens v. Stevens" Results 401 - 420 of 11,151
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2023, 9:51 pm by Ilya Somin
  In my last post, I outlined some things I hoped to learn from Justice John Paul Stevens' papers about Kelo v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 10:25 am by Josh Blackman
A marshal protecting Justice Steven Field killed a man in defense of the justice. [read post]
4 May 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
 By Eric SegallTwenty years ago, Justice Sandra Day O'Connor wrote the following in Grutter v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 9:03 pm by renholding
I know that much time went into this release, including many hours over at least one very taxing weekend put in by Melissa Roverts Harke, Robert Holowka, Sirimal Mukerjee, Adele Kittredge Murray, Neema Nassiri-Motlagh, Jill Pritzker, David Stevens, Thomas Strumpf, Sarah ten Siethoff, and Samuel K. [read post]
3 May 2023, 11:49 am by Ilya Somin
      The post What I Hope to Learn from Justice Stevens' Papers on Kelo v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 10:09 am by Derek Muller
Many of the papers of the late Justice John Paul Stevens have been released, including papers from Bush v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 5:40 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
NBC News: “Internal documents concerning the Supreme Court‘s historic Bush v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 7:26 am by SCOTUSblog
Marimow & Robert Barnes, The Washington Post) Prominent Retired Judge Calls for Ethics Rules for Supreme Court Justices (Abbie VanSickle, The New York Times) Supreme Court LGBTQ+ Rights Case: What’s At Stake in 303 Creative v. [read post]
1 May 2023, 3:35 pm
As the Supreme Court has become more conservative, the justices have grown less likely to defer to federal agencies under the 1984 precedent in Chevron U.S.A. v. [read post]
1 May 2023, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
, (Notre Dame Law Review, Vol. 98 (forthcoming 2023)).Simrin Chowdhury, The Economic Implications of Roe v. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 7:13 am by Eric Goldman
Longarzo * DMCA’s Unhelpful 512(f) Preempts Helpful State Law Claims–Stevens v. [read post]