Search for: "Test Plaintiff"
Results 401 - 420
of 21,856
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2015, 8:25 am
Sanborn relies on the same evidence as the Phase I Georgia Plaintiffs, whose specific ObTape was not tested, either. [read post]
24 May 2008, 8:27 am
The Shigley Law Firm represents plaintiffs in wrongful death and catastrophic injury cases arising from motor carrier accidents statewide in Georgia. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 7:08 am
The reason for the two-tailed test, however, is not really tied to multiple testing. [read post]
21 May 2009, 7:45 am
I testified about many things, but the most important is that you can easily replace the firmware of an AVC Advantage voting machine to make it cheat in elections (but not cheat when it's being tested outside of elections). [read post]
31 May 2017, 6:31 am
Cassandra discusses then-Judge Gorsuch's opinion in Dudnikov, finding jurisdiction in Colorado under the Effects Test based on a letter sent to California that affected the plaintiff's behavior and business in Colorado. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 1:53 pm
The plaintiff, Dr. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 5:33 am
” (Note that this is a complete reversal of the idea motivating Conte Bros., the Third Circuit case whose test was adopted by Phoenix of Broward. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 1:51 pm
The court applied a balancing test to reach its holding: The plaintiffs express a legitimate concern for their privacy and, more compelling for the anonymity analysis, an understandable fear of social stigmatization. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 2:28 pm
” The defendant would challenge the scientific testing through cross examination to show why the plaintiff’s test was unreliable. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 6:54 am
The Court next considered whether the plaintiff was the sole or co-author of the work under the Second Circuit's two-pronged test which looks at whether "'each of the putative co-authors (1) made independently copyrightable contributions to the work; and (2) fully intended to be co-authors.'" [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 10:30 am
” The agreement goes on to state that an employee “will be subject to termination” for a positive test result…” The plaintiffs in the case are a total of ten officers who submitted hair samples, tested positive for cocaine, and were terminated as a result. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 3:00 am
In addition to the allegation that he made monthly purchases of the defendant’s pre-packaged cheese and cupcakes, the critical basis for the plaintiff’s claim that he was overcharged was the New York City Department of Consumer Affairs (the “DCA’s”) press release announcement that 89 percent of the defendant’s pre-packaged products tested by the DCA were mislabeled, and the press release’s conclusion that the mislabeling was… [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 9:33 am
One of the clearest examples for where the gender of the plaintiff may matter to the analysis is in the context of workplace drug testing. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:38 am
April 22, 2024) The parties both sell tests for determining when a woman is ovulating. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 4:45 am
The court held that the state requirement survived plaintiffs' 1st Amendment challenge as a neutral law of general application. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 2:20 pm
Rozier, despite siding with the plaintiffs, has not yet issued an official order. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 1:28 am
The device was fast tracked to the market based upon an FDA policy that allows a product to be sold without additional testing if it similar to a product on the market. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 9:16 am
For this reason at least one women’s health charitable organization is asking for donations to perform more testing, since the federal government has been less than willing to perform much needed testing on talcum powder products. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 9:16 am
For this reason at least one women’s health charitable organization is asking for donations to perform more testing, since the federal government has been less than willing to perform much needed testing on talcum powder products. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 4:00 am
Last week, the Department of Housing and Urban Development issued a final rule that provides that if a practice has a “discriminatory effect,” HUD or a private plaintiff can establish liability under the Fair Housing Act (FHA), even if there is no discriminatory intent. [read post]
