Search for: "The Delaware Supreme Court Justices"
Results 401 - 420
of 1,790
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
It is highly unlikely there could be a Supreme Court decision even before the end of the current congressional term in January. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 12:20 pm
I once wrote that: When any Chief Justice of the Delaware Supreme Court speaks on a corporate law topic, lawyers and academics who toil in that doctrinal vineyard listen. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 4:59 am
Reversing the chancery court, a majority of the Delaware Supreme Court determined that the CEO’s conflict would have been material to the Towers board. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 5:54 am
The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in Seila Law v. [read post]
3 Jul 2020, 6:09 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, on Friday, June 26, 2020 Tags: Capital markets, COVID-19, Emerging markets, ESG, Financial Services Committee, Investor protection, Market conditions, Market reaction, Misconduct, Program on Institutional Investors, Retail investors, SEC enforcement, Securities enforcement, Securities regulation, Systemic risk, US House Supreme Court Limits SEC Disgorgement… [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 1:12 am
His Honour dissented from the majority of Justices of Appeal Meagher and Gleeson. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 6:35 am
., the former Chief Justice of the Delaware Supreme Court, is the Austin Wakeman Scott Lecturer in Law and Senior Fellow at the Harvard Law School Program on Corporate Governance, as well as Of Counsel at Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 12:26 pm
[v] Two examples of these strategic practices emerged following the Delaware Court of Chancery’s decision in the Trulia case[vi] and the Supreme Court’s decision in the Cyan case. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 9:39 am
Justice Robert H. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 7:42 am
As the Supreme Court noted in Raines v. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 5:48 am
Romanoff v Trustees of the Sheryl Romanoff Irrevocable Grantor Trust. 2020 NY Slip Op 31150(U) May 4, 2020 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 157641/2014 Judge: James E. d’Auguste illustrates how the thicket grows. [read post]
21 May 2020, 1:04 pm
Additionally, members of the criminal justice system formed the Ohio Trial Advisory Group which submitted recommendations to the Ohio Supreme Court proposing best practices for conducting jury trials in the era of COVID-19. [read post]
16 May 2020, 6:43 am
., the former Chief Justice of the Delaware Supreme Court, is the Austin Wakeman Scott Lecturer in Law and Senior Fellow at the Harvard Law School Program on Corporate Governance, as well as Of Counsel at Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz; and Timothy Youmans is Lead-North America, EOS at Federated Hermes. [read post]
15 May 2020, 3:00 am
Court Asks Retired Judge to Oppose Justice Dept. [read post]
11 May 2020, 6:18 am
The Supreme Court held that California could not exercise jurisdiction over the claims brought by non-residents because there was no connection between the forum and those claims. [read post]
11 May 2020, 3:19 am
In her decision, Justice Schecter granted in part and denied in part the defendants’ motion to dismiss. [read post]
6 May 2020, 3:55 pm
"] Today the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Little Sisters of the Poor v. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 5:42 pm
Delaware Supreme Court Analysis On appeal, in a 53-page unanimous opinion by Justice Karen Valihura, the Delaware Supreme Court reversed the Court of Chancery’s decision, holding that such forum-selection provisions are indeed valid and survive a facial challenge. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 5:18 pm
My friend former Delaware Supreme Court Chief Justice Leo Strine reportedly has joined Wachtell Lipton, where "will advise Wachtell’s clients on mergers, litigation and other matters. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 4:39 am
Washington, the Supreme Court held that a defendant may be held liable for such cross-border issues if they have at least a minimum level of contact with the State that seeks to hold them liable and there must be a reasonable expectation of being sued in that State.[2] In this regard, courts in the US have held that mere advertisements on a website are not enough to hold a defendant liable for a cross-border tort and to exercise personal jurisdiction there.[3] Before this,… [read post]
